Utah Code » Title 63G, Chapter 4 — Administrative Procedures Act; part 63G-4-1 — General Provisions
Utah Code

Utah Code § 63G-4-101 (2026)

Title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section UT-LEGle.utah.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter is known as the "Administrative Procedures Act."

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2013–2021 · leading case: Monarrez v. Utah Dep't of Transp., 2016 UT 10 (Utah 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Monarrez v. Utah Dep't of Transp., 2016 UT 10 (Utah 2016). “Urag Cope § 63G-4-101 et seq. The current version of the APA contains the same pertinent language as the 1989 version interpreted in Harper.”
Murray v. Utah Labor Comm'n, 2013 UT 38 (Utah 2013). “Urag Cope §§ 63G-4-101 to -601. 8 . Murray v. Labor Comm'n, 2012 UT App 33, ¶ 11 , 271 P.”
Taylorsville City v. Taylorsville City Emp. Appeal Bd., 2013 UT App 69 (Utah Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “3d 291 ; see also Utah Code Ann. §§ 63G-4-101 to -601 (2011 & Supp.”
C.R. England v. Hakem, 2021 UT App 108 (Utah Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 2× “UAPA states that “[a] party shall file a petition for judicial review of final agency action within 30 days after the date that the order constituting the final agency action is issued[.]” Id. § 63G-4-401(3)(a).”
Labor Comm'n v. Price, 2020 UT App 24 (Utah Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 2× “Jurisdiction of the District Court ¶11 Under the Utah Administrative Procedures Act (UAPA), Utah Code Ann. §§ 63G-4-101 to -601 (LexisNexis 2016), parties typically have thirty days to file a petition for judicial review of a final agency action.”
Murray v. Utah Labor Comm'n, 2013 UT 38 (Utah 2013). “Murray failed to establish that his work- related accident, rather than his preexisting back condition, was the legal cause of his injury. I. UNDER A PLAIN-LANGUAGE INTERPRETATION OF UAPA, SECTION 63G-4-403 INCORPORATES STANDARDS OF REVIEW FOR SOME, BUT NOT ALL, AGENCY ACTION…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.