Utah Code
Utah Code § 73-3a-108 (2026)
Approval of applications -- Criteria
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
UT-LEGle.utah.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The state engineer shall:
undertake an investigation of any application made under this chapter; and
approve the application, if the state engineer finds that:
the proposed appropriation or change:
is consistent with Utah's reasonable water conservation policies or objectives;
is not contrary to the public welfare; and
does not impair the ability of the state of Utah to comply with its obligation under any interstate compact or judicial decree which apportions water among Utah and other states; and
the water can be transported, measured, delivered, and beneficially used in the recipient state.
In reviewing the criteria of Subsections (1)(b)(i)(B) and (1)(b)(i)(C), the state engineer shall consider the following factors:
the supply and quality of water available to the state of Utah;
the current and reasonably anticipated water demands of the state of Utah;
whether there are current or reasonably anticipated water shortages within Utah;
whether the water that is the subject of the application could feasibly be used to alleviate current or reasonably anticipated water shortages within Utah;
the alternative supply and sources of water available to the applicant in the state where the applicant intends to use the water; and
the demands placed on the applicant's alternate water supply in the state where the applicant intends to use the water.
If any application fails to meet any criteria of Subsection (1), it shall be rejected.
The state engineer may condition any approval to ensure that the use of the water in another state:
is subject to the same laws, rules, and controls that may be imposed upon water use within the state of Utah; or
is consistent with the terms and conditions of any applicable interstate compact to which the state of Utah is a party.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case (1 in the last 5 years), 2025–2025 · leading case: Water Horse v. Wilhelmsen, 2025 UT 43 (Utah 2025).
Water Horse v. Wilhelmsen, 2025 UT 43 (Utah 2025). “, UTAH CODE § 73-3a-108. Relevant here, the state engineer can approve an application only where the appropriation would be “for a useful and beneficial purpose.”
— Utah Code § 73-3a-108(1) — 1 case
Water Horse v. Wilhelmsen, 2025 UT 43 (Utah 2025). “, UTAH CODE § 73-3a-108. Relevant here, the state engineer can approve an application only where the appropriation would be “for a useful and beneficial purpose.”
— Utah Code § 73-3a-108(1)(b) — 1 case
Water Horse v. Wilhelmsen, 2025 UT 43 (Utah 2025). “, UTAH CODE § 73-3a-108. Relevant here, the state engineer can approve an application only where the appropriation would be “for a useful and beneficial purpose.”
— Utah Code § 73-3a-108(1)(b)(i) — 1 case
Water Horse v. Wilhelmsen, 2025 UT 43 (Utah 2025). “, UTAH CODE § 73-3a-108. Relevant here, the state engineer can approve an application only where the appropriation would be “for a useful and beneficial purpose.”
— Utah Code § 73-3a-108(1)(b)(i)(A) — 1 case
Water Horse v. Wilhelmsen, 2025 UT 43 (Utah 2025). “, UTAH CODE § 73-3a-108. Relevant here, the state engineer can approve an application only where the appropriation would be “for a useful and beneficial purpose.”
— Utah Code § 73-3a-108(1)(b)(i)(D) — 1 case
Water Horse v. Wilhelmsen, 2025 UT 43 (Utah 2025). “, UTAH CODE § 73-3a-108. Relevant here, the state engineer can approve an application only where the appropriation would be “for a useful and beneficial purpose.”
— Utah Code § 73-3a-108(1)(b)(ii) — 1 case
Water Horse v. Wilhelmsen, 2025 UT 43 (Utah 2025). “, UTAH CODE § 73-3a-108. Relevant here, the state engineer can approve an application only where the appropriation would be “for a useful and beneficial purpose.”
— Utah Code § 73-3a-108(3) — 1 case
Water Horse v. Wilhelmsen, 2025 UT 43 (Utah 2025). “, UTAH CODE § 73-3a-108. Relevant here, the state engineer can approve an application only where the appropriation would be “for a useful and beneficial purpose.”
— Utah Code § 73-3a-108(4) — 1 case
Water Horse v. Wilhelmsen, 2025 UT 43 (Utah 2025). “, UTAH CODE § 73-3a-108. Relevant here, the state engineer can approve an application only where the appropriation would be “for a useful and beneficial purpose.”
— Utah Code § 73-3a-108(4)(a) — 1 case
Water Horse v. Wilhelmsen, 2025 UT 43 (Utah 2025). “, UTAH CODE § 73-3a-108. Relevant here, the state engineer can approve an application only where the appropriation would be “for a useful and beneficial purpose.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.