Utah Code » Title 78B, Chapter 9 — Postconviction Remedies Act; part 78B-9-1 — General Provisions
Utah Code

Utah Code § 78B-9-101 (2026)

Title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section UT-LEGle.utah.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter is known as the "Post-Conviction Remedies Act."

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 50 cases (14 in the last 5 years), 2008–2026 · leading case: Patterson v. State, 2021 UT 52 (Utah 2021).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Patterson v. State, 2021 UT 52 (Utah 2021). · cites it 4× “¶12 In his amended petition, Patterson seeks ―postconviction relief from his conviction and sentence pursuant to the Postconviction Remedies Act (Utah Code Ann. § 78B-9-101 et seq.) and [the] court‘s authority under the Utah Constitution.”
State v. Robertson, 2017 UT 27 (Utah 2017). · cites it 2× “See Utah Code §§ 78B-9-101 to -405. Utah Code § 76-1-404(1).”
Gardner v. State, 2010 UT 46 (Utah 2010). · cites it 2× “pending resolution of this post-conviction matter." In his brief on appeal and at oral argument, counsel for Mr.”
Thomas v. Hillyard, 2019 UT 29 (Utah 2019). · cites it 2× “Utah Code §§ 78B-9-101 to -405. This act is the "sole remedy for any person who challenges a conviction or sentence for a criminal offense and who has exhausted all other legal remedies.”
Landry v. State, 2016 UT App 164 (Utah Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “Landry then filed the instant petition for relief under the Post-Conviction Remedies Act (PCRA), Utah Code Ann. §§ 78B-9-101 to -405 (LexisNex-is 2012), raising a number of theories, including ineffective assistance of appellate counsel.”
State v. Badikyan, 2018 UT App 168 (Utah Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “In his reply brief, Defendant asserts without further discussion that the "the challenges set forth in Defendant's timely [motion to withdraw guilty plea] are essentially one and the same as those argued on appeal." This statement lacks legal and factual analysis and is…”
Kell v. State, 285 P.3d 1133 (Utah 2012). “22 Furthermore, those "unusual and exceptional cireumstances" would have to be cireumstances that did not manipulate or circumvent the Post-Convietion Remedies Act (PCRA), now codified in Utah Code sections 78B-9-101 to -110. The PCRA allows "a person who has been convicted and…”
Mulder v. State, 2016 UT App 207 (Utah Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “See Utah Code Ann. §§ 78B-9-101 to -405 (LexisNexis 2012).”
Burke v. State, 2015 UT App 1 (Utah Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “The traffic engineer's routes also included a stop at a gas station where one of Father's checks was cashed.”
Rippey v. State, 2014 UT App 240 (Utah Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “See Utah Code Ann. §§ 78B-9-101 to -405 (LexisNex-is 2012 & Supp.”
Arriaga v. State, 2020 UT 37 (Utah 2020). “After sentencing, he filed a pro se petition under the Post-Conviction Remedies Act (PCRA),1 arguing that his guilty plea _____________________________________________________________ 1 UTAH CODE §§ 78B-9-101 to -503. ARRIAGA v. STATE Opinion of the Court was unknowing and…”
Tillman v. State, 2012 UT App 289 (Utah Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “See Utah Code Ann. §§ 78B-9-101 to -405 (2008 & Supp.”
Show all 50 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.