Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 04, § 1107 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 4 V.S.A. § 1107)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2010–2010 · leading case: Shlansky v. City of Burlington, 2010 VT 90 (Vt. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Shlansky v. City of Burlington, 2010 VT 90 (Vt. 2010). “The most plausible reading of the judicial bureau hearing officer’s order is that he did not intend to use the power of the court to compel discovery in a proceeding where it would not be appropriate but that he determined — to no legal effect given his lack of jurisdiction…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 04, § 1107(a) — 1 case
Shlansky v. City of Burlington, 2010 VT 90 (Vt. 2010). “The most plausible reading of the judicial bureau hearing officer’s order is that he did not intend to use the power of the court to compel discovery in a proceeding where it would not be appropriate but that he determined — to no legal effect given his lack of jurisdiction…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.