Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 04 Chapter 1
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 04, § 35 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 4 V.S.A. § 35)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2014–2025 · leading case: Berol Dewdney & Cordelia Dewdney v. Ralph E. Duncan, IV, 2025 VT 26 (Vt. 2025).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Berol Dewdney & Cordelia Dewdney v. Ralph E. Duncan, IV, 2025 VT 26 (Vt. 2025). · cites it 3× “See 4 V.S.A. § 35; 14A V.S.A. §§ 201-203; Wilson v.”
Donald Gould v. Town of Monkton, 2016 VT 84 (Vt. 2016). “§ 34 does not include the term “exclusive” in describing the Environmental Division’s jurisdiction over environmental law proceedings.”
Caroline Maier v. Siegfried Maier, 2021 VT 88 (Vt. 2021). “13 (allowing probate court to hold hearing to determine validity of request to take spousal share); 4 V.S.A. § 35 (listing matters within probate division jurisdiction).”
dewdney v. duncan (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). · cites it 2× “5 Pursuant to 4 V.S.A. § 35, the Probate Division has jurisdiction, inter alia, of “the administration of trusts pursuant to Title 14A.”
St Pierre v. Morin (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). · cites it 2× “See generally 4 V.S.A. § 35. Count II of the complaint “seeks a declaration that Defendant’s refusal to vacate the Property” violated the “Trust’s no-contest clause so that Defendant forfeited her right to receive the $15,000.”
Thum v. O'Dea (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014). “4 V.S.A. § 35(2). The Vermont Supreme Court allowed the superior court equity jurisdiction over claims brought against the administrators of an estate.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 04, § 35(2) — 1 case
Thum v. O'Dea (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014). “4 V.S.A. § 35(2). The Vermont Supreme Court allowed the superior court equity jurisdiction over claims brought against the administrators of an estate.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 04, § 35(3) — 1 case
St Pierre v. Morin (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). “See generally 4 V.S.A. § 35. Count II of the complaint “seeks a declaration that Defendant’s refusal to vacate the Property” violated the “Trust’s no-contest clause so that Defendant forfeited her right to receive the $15,000.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.