Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 06, § 4810 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 002 : WATER QUALITY; REQUIRED AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES AND BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

(Cite as: 6 V.S.A. § 4810)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2003–2025 · leading case: Trickett v. Ochs, 2003 VT 91 (Vt. 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Trickett v. Ochs, 2003 VT 91 (Vt. 2003). “§ 6001, who follow these practices shall be presumed to be in compliance with water quality standards____ 6 V.S.A. § 4810(a); see also id. § 4811(1) (commissioner has power to make rules “which define practices described in section 4810” as well as any other rules deemed…”
In Re 8 Taft Street DRB & NOV Appeals (Stephen Wille Padnos & Sharon Wille Padnos, Appellants), 2025 VT 27 (Vt. 2025). · cites it 4× “§ 4810, required agricultural practices are the “farm and land management practices that will control and reduce agricultural nonpoint source pollution and subsequent nutrient losses from farm fields and production areas to surface and ground waters of the State or across…”
Moore Accessory Structure Permit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2010). · cites it 3× “§§ 1021(f) and 1259(f) and 6 V.S.A. § 4810]. (c) A person shall notify a municipality of the intent to build a farm structure, and shall abide by setbacks approved by the commissioner of agriculture, food and markets.”
Intervale Ctr., Inc. & Half Pint Farm (Hoop House) (Vt. Super. Ct. 2009). · cites it 2× “The Agency’s announcement of a conditional AAPs determination does not appear to be authorized by either 6 V.S.A. §§ 4810– 4815 or 10 V.S.A. §§ 1021(f) and 1259(f).”
In Re Petition of Randolph Davis Solar LLC (Joan Allen & Michael Binder, Appellants), 2025 VT 63 (Vt. 2025). “, 6 V.S.A. § 4810(d) (charging Agency of Agriculture, Food and Markets with implementing practices consistent with “water pollution control requirements of 10 V.”
Lawson Farms LFO Permit Amendment (Vt. Super. Ct. 2008). “The statute directs the Secretary of the Agency to coordinate with the Agency of Natural Resources (ANR), 6 V.S.A. § 4810(b), regarding discharges to the waters of the state from concentrated animal feeding operations, but otherwise the state regulatory authority over large…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 06, § 4810(a) — 2 cases
Trickett v. Ochs, 2003 VT 91 (Vt. 2003). “§ 6001, who follow these practices shall be presumed to be in compliance with water quality standards____ 6 V.S.A. § 4810(a); see also id. § 4811(1) (commissioner has power to make rules “which define practices described in section 4810” as well as any other rules deemed…”
Intervale Ctr., Inc. & Half Pint Farm (Hoop House) (Vt. Super. Ct. 2009). “The Agency’s announcement of a conditional AAPs determination does not appear to be authorized by either 6 V.S.A. §§ 4810– 4815 or 10 V.S.A. §§ 1021(f) and 1259(f).”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 06, § 4810(b) — 2 cases
In Re 8 Taft Street DRB & NOV Appeals (Stephen Wille Padnos & Sharon Wille Padnos, Appellants), 2025 VT 27 (Vt. 2025). “§ 4810, required agricultural practices are the “farm and land management practices that will control and reduce agricultural nonpoint source pollution and subsequent nutrient losses from farm fields and production areas to surface and ground waters of the State or across…”
Lawson Farms LFO Permit Amendment (Vt. Super. Ct. 2008). “The statute directs the Secretary of the Agency to coordinate with the Agency of Natural Resources (ANR), 6 V.S.A. § 4810(b), regarding discharges to the waters of the state from concentrated animal feeding operations, but otherwise the state regulatory authority over large…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 06, § 4810(d) — 1 case
In Re Petition of Randolph Davis Solar LLC (Joan Allen & Michael Binder, Appellants), 2025 VT 63 (Vt. 2025). “, 6 V.S.A. § 4810(d) (charging Agency of Agriculture, Food and Markets with implementing practices consistent with “water pollution control requirements of 10 V.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.