Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 07, § 222 (2026)

Second-class licenses

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 002 : RETAIL LICENSES AND PERMITS

(Cite as: 7 V.S.A. § 222)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1962–2013 · leading case: Prue v. Royer, Sr., & Dep't of Liquor Control.
Prue v. Royer, Sr., & Dep't of Liquor Control (Vt. 2013). “See 7 V.S.A. § 222. Neither plaintiffs nor defendant were able to find a copy of their original agreement.”
State v. Rusin (Vt. 1989). · cites it 2× “Similarly, 7 V.S.A. § 222(3) prohibits the employment of persons "under the age of 18" in certain establishments, for the purpose of preparing, mixing, dispensing, or serving alcoholic beverages.”
In re DLC Corp. (Vt. 1998). · cites it 2× “, 7 V.S.A. § 222 (“With the approval of the liquor control board, the control commissioners may grant” a first or second-class license.”
In Re Handy (Vt. 1984). “See also 7 V.S.A. § 222 (2) (second class licensee shall not sell malt or vinous beverage to a minor).”
Coliseum Enter., Inc. v. Campbell (Vt. 2002). · cites it 2× “7 V.S.A. §222. Accordingly, plaintiffs’ application was forwarded to the board.”
Verrill v. Daley (Vt. 1967). “7 V.S.A. section 222. The liquor control board also issued a third-class license.”
Carousel Grill, Inc. v. Liquor Control Bd. (Vt. 1962). “The petitioner contends this action by the Liquor Control Board is arbitrary and capricious entitling it to the remedy of mandamus.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 07, § 222(1) — 1 case
In re DLC Corp. (Vt. 1998). “, 7 V.S.A. § 222 (“With the approval of the liquor control board, the control commissioners may grant” a first or second-class license.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 07, § 222(3) — 1 case
State v. Rusin (Vt. 1989). “Similarly, 7 V.S.A. § 222(3) prohibits the employment of persons "under the age of 18" in certain establishments, for the purpose of preparing, mixing, dispensing, or serving alcoholic beverages.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.