Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 08 Chapter 129
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 08, § 4723 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 8 V.S.A. § 4723)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2002–2025 · leading case: City of Burlington v. Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Ins., 190 F. Supp. 2d 663 (D. Vt. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
City of Burlington v. Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Ins., 190 F. Supp. 2d 663 (D. Vt. 2002). “18 The VITPA also declares that “[n]o person shall engage in any trade practice which is determined to be an unfair method of competition or an unfair or deceptive act or practice in the business of insurance,” 8 V.S.A. § 4723, and vests power in the VDBISHCA Commissioner to…”
JLD Props. of St. Albans, LLC v. Patriot Ins. Co. (D. Vt. 2021). · cites it 3× “intiff argues that the court’s prior decision dismissing Plaintiffs VCFA claims “is incorrect” because (1) a “determination of whether a claim is ‘on the policy’ is a fact intensive inquiry” that should not be undertaken until after discovery; and (2) Plaintiff's VCFA claims…”
JLD Props. of St. Albans, LLC v. Patriot Ins. Co. (D. Vt. 2021). · cites it 2× “Defendant contends that Counts II and III of the Complaint must be dismissed because there is no private right of action under 8 V.S.A. §§ 4723, 4724, and because the VCFA does not apply to insurance claims.”
James W. Dabney v. the Ohio Cas. Ins. Co. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2025). “entitl[ing the association] to recover compensatory damages, punitive damages, and attorneys' fees for violation of Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 8, § 4723 , [and] . .”
Poirier v. Farmers Ins. Grp. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2010). “Unfair Insurance Trade Practices Poirier next alleges that Poulos engaged in unfair insurance trade practices in violation of 8 V.S.A. § 4723. Section 4723 prohibits insurers from engaging in an unfair method of competition or an unfair or deceptive act or practice in the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.