Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 2602 (2026)

Sale or transfer; price disclosure; mobile home uniform bill of sale

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 9 V.S.A. § 2602)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2012–2025 · leading case: Smith v. Benware, No. 24-cv-5026 (Vt. Super. Ct. May 1, 2025).
Smith v. Benware, No. 24-cv-5026 (Vt. Super. Ct. May 1, 2025). · cites it 3× “The motion to dismiss is premised on the argument that the agreement between the parties involves is a defective rent-to-own agreement of a mobile home under 9 V.S.A. § 2602(e). According to Defendant, the agreement does not satisfy the requirements of section 2602(e)(2).”
Mathieu v. Town of Westford, No. S0354 (Vt. Super. Ct. Aug. 13, 2012). · cites it 4× “ANALYSIS Certain amendments to 9 V.S.A. § 2602 became effective on September 1, 2010, under which, prior to physically relocating a mobile home to another town, the owner must provide a completed but unexecuted copy of a “mobile home uniform bill of sale” to the town clerk in…”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 2602(b): 1 case
Mathieu v. Town of Westford, No. S0354 (Vt. Super. Ct. Aug. 13, 2012). “ANALYSIS Certain amendments to 9 V.S.A. § 2602 became effective on September 1, 2010, under which, prior to physically relocating a mobile home to another town, the owner must provide a completed but unexecuted copy of a “mobile home uniform bill of sale” to the town clerk in…”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 2602(b)(1): 1 case
Mathieu v. Town of Westford, No. S0354 (Vt. Super. Ct. Aug. 13, 2012). “ANALYSIS Certain amendments to 9 V.S.A. § 2602 became effective on September 1, 2010, under which, prior to physically relocating a mobile home to another town, the owner must provide a completed but unexecuted copy of a “mobile home uniform bill of sale” to the town clerk in…”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 2602(e): 1 case
Smith v. Benware, No. 24-cv-5026 (Vt. Super. Ct. May 1, 2025). “The motion to dismiss is premised on the argument that the agreement between the parties involves is a defective rent-to-own agreement of a mobile home under 9 V.S.A. § 2602(e). According to Defendant, the agreement does not satisfy the requirements of section 2602(e)(2).”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 2602(e)(1)(A): 1 case
Smith v. Benware, No. 24-cv-5026 (Vt. Super. Ct. May 1, 2025). “The motion to dismiss is premised on the argument that the agreement between the parties involves is a defective rent-to-own agreement of a mobile home under 9 V.S.A. § 2602(e). According to Defendant, the agreement does not satisfy the requirements of section 2602(e)(2).”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 2602(e)(1)(B): 1 case
Smith v. Benware, No. 24-cv-5026 (Vt. Super. Ct. May 1, 2025). “The motion to dismiss is premised on the argument that the agreement between the parties involves is a defective rent-to-own agreement of a mobile home under 9 V.S.A. § 2602(e). According to Defendant, the agreement does not satisfy the requirements of section 2602(e)(2).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.