Vermont Statutes Annotated
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 4607 (2026)
Effect on other law
✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 9 V.S.A. § 4607)
-
§ 4607. Effect on other law
(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, this chapter displaces conflicting tort, restitutionary, and any other law of this State providing civil remedies for misappropriation of a trade secret.
(b) This chapter does not affect:
(1) contractual remedies, whether or not based upon misappropriation of a trade secret;
(2) other civil remedies that are not based upon misappropriation of a trade secret; or
(3) criminal remedies, whether or not based upon misappropriation of a trade secret. (Added 1995, No. 90 (Adj. Sess.), § 1; amended 2013, No. 199 (Adj. Sess.), § 17.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2001–2025 · leading case: Dicks v. Jensen, 768 A.2d 1279 (Vt. 2001).
Dicks v. Jensen, 768 A.2d 1279 (Vt. 2001). “” 9 V.S.A. § 4607. Thus the statute plainly bars a common law remedy on this theory.”
Omega Optical, Inc. v. Chroma Tech. Corp., 800 A.2d 1064 (Vt. 2002). “2d at 1285; see also 9 V.S.A. § 4607. Therefore, if the VTSA governed this case, arguably at least some of Omega’s claims would be eliminated.”
Mylan Tech., Inc. v. Zydus Noveltech, Inc., No. S0041 (Vt. Super. Ct. Aug. 9, 2012). “, PANKAJ PATEL and SUNIL ROY DECISION ON MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS AND 9 V.S.A. § 4607(a)) This case concerns claims by Mylan Technologies, Inc.”
Concepts NREC, LLC v. Qiu, No. 5:20-cv-00133 (D. Vt. July 21, 2025). “” 9 V.S.A. § 4607 (emphasis added). Therefore, Plaintiff’s claim for breach of the common law duty of loyalty may be barred by the Act if it falls within the scope of this provision.”
Grand Circle LLC v. Rand, No. 389 (Vt. Super. Ct. May 3, 2005). “” 9 V.S.A. § 4607(a); Omega Optical, Inc. v.”
Mylan Tech., Inc. v. Zydus Noveltech, Inc., No. 41 (Vt. Super. Ct. Apr. 7, 2015). “9 V.S.A. § 4607. It then argues that the unfair competition and tortious interference claims are just that, because they are based upon the same facts, and must therefore fail.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 4607(a): 2 cases
Mylan Tech., Inc. v. Zydus Noveltech, Inc., No. S0041 (Vt. Super. Ct. Aug. 9, 2012). “, PANKAJ PATEL and SUNIL ROY DECISION ON MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS AND 9 V.S.A. § 4607(a)) This case concerns claims by Mylan Technologies, Inc.”
Grand Circle LLC v. Rand, No. 389 (Vt. Super. Ct. May 3, 2005). “” 9 V.S.A. § 4607(a); Omega Optical, Inc. v.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 4607(a)(2): 1 case
Grand Circle LLC v. Rand, No. 389 (Vt. Super. Ct. May 3, 2005). “” 9 V.S.A. § 4607(a); Omega Optical, Inc. v.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 4607(b)(2): 1 case
Mylan Tech., Inc. v. Zydus Noveltech, Inc., No. S0041 (Vt. Super. Ct. Aug. 9, 2012). “, PANKAJ PATEL and SUNIL ROY DECISION ON MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS AND 9 V.S.A. § 4607(a)) This case concerns claims by Mylan Technologies, Inc.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.