Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 1252 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : WATER POLLUTION CONTROL

(Cite as: 10 V.S.A. § 1252)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1983–2018 · leading case: Petition of Town of Sherburne, 581 A.2d 274 (Vt. 1990).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Petition of Town of Sherburne, 581 A.2d 274 (Vt. 1990). · cites it 3× “In our view, these definitional provisions are consistent with both federal law and the statutory descriptions of Class B and C waters set out in 10 V.S.A. § 1252. See footnote 1, supra. After reviewing the evidence, the Board found that none of the Class B designated uses were…”
City of Montpelier v. Barnett, Sanborn & Nat. Resources Bd., 2012 VT 32 (Vt. 2012). · cites it 2× “1 Somewhat confusingly, the NRB appears to use the designation A(2) for suitable public water supplies and A(l) for ecological waters, although 10 V.S.A. § 1252 defines the classifications in the reverse order.”
In Re Hawk Mountain Corp., 542 A.2d 261 (Vt. 1988). · cites it 2× “”); see also 10 V.S.A. §§ 1252, 905 *183 (enabling legislation allowing the Water Resources Board to promulgate such regulations).”
Appeal of Stratton Corp., 600 A.2d 297 (Vt. 1991). · cites it 2× “10 V.S.A. § 1252(a). The system establishes water quality standards to meet federal law.”
In re Reclassification of Airport & Pond Brooks, 457 A.2d 635 (Vt. 1983). “See 10 V.S.A. § 1252. Montpelier contends that the order of the Water Resources Board affirmed below should have been reversed because there is nothing by way of findings to support the order made by the Board setting aside the legislative classification of such brooks as Class…”
Morrisville Hydroelectric Proj Water Quality - Decision on the Merits (Vt. Super. Ct. 2018). · cites it 2× “High quality aquatic habitat, however, is undefined in the VWQS or in another formal document.”
Unified buddhist Church, Inc. Indirect Discharge Permit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2008). “§ 1259 was contemporaneous with the section of the statute (10 V.S.A. § 1252(e)) requiring the WRB to “adopt standards of water quality to achieve the purposes” of the classification of Vermont surface waters.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 1252(a) — 3 cases
Appeal of Stratton Corp., 600 A.2d 297 (Vt. 1991). “10 V.S.A. § 1252(a). The system establishes water quality standards to meet federal law.”
City of Montpelier v. Barnett, Sanborn & Nat. Resources Bd., 2012 VT 32 (Vt. 2012). “1 Somewhat confusingly, the NRB appears to use the designation A(2) for suitable public water supplies and A(l) for ecological waters, although 10 V.S.A. § 1252 defines the classifications in the reverse order.”
In Re Hawk Mountain Corp., 542 A.2d 261 (Vt. 1988). “”); see also 10 V.S.A. §§ 1252, 905 *183 (enabling legislation allowing the Water Resources Board to promulgate such regulations).”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 1252(c) — 1 case
Petition of Town of Sherburne, 581 A.2d 274 (Vt. 1990). “In our view, these definitional provisions are consistent with both federal law and the statutory descriptions of Class B and C waters set out in 10 V.S.A. § 1252. See footnote 1, supra. After reviewing the evidence, the Board found that none of the Class B designated uses were…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 1252(e) — 2 cases
Morrisville Hydroelectric Proj Water Quality - Decision on the Merits (Vt. Super. Ct. 2018). “High quality aquatic habitat, however, is undefined in the VWQS or in another formal document.”
Unified buddhist Church, Inc. Indirect Discharge Permit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2008). “§ 1259 was contemporaneous with the section of the statute (10 V.S.A. § 1252(e)) requiring the WRB to “adopt standards of water quality to achieve the purposes” of the classification of Vermont surface waters.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.