Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 1424 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 10 V.S.A. § 1424)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2006–2021 · leading case: City of Montpelier v. Barnett, Sanborn & Nat. Resources Bd., 2012 VT 32 (Vt. 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
City of Montpelier v. Barnett, Sanborn & Nat. Resources Bd., 2012 VT 32 (Vt. 2012). · cites it 3× “The Panel’s rules *447 for water use, established pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 1424, further encourage this understanding because, as discussed specifically infra, they place restrictions on the use of Berlin Pond that do not include restrictions on swimming, fishing, or boating.”
Beyers v. Water Resources Bd., 2006 VT 65 (Vt. 2006). · cites it 3× “Plaintiff asserts that the Board’s decision was contrary to law because the Board failed to follow 10 V.S.A. § 1424(c) and VUPWR § 2.6, which encourage resolution of conflicts in a manner that provides for normal uses to the extent possible.”
Grimaldi NOV - Decision on Motions (Vt. Super. Ct. 2021). “) 4 The Legislature has authorized the Water Resource Panel to formally delegate its authority to municipalities to regulate water use abutting public waters, pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 1424 (f). 5 (noting that “nowhere in Title 24, chapter 117, nor in any provision of Title 10,…”
Svendsen Docket Extension Variance (Vt. Super. Ct. 2009). “10 V.S.A. § 1424(f). The -5- municipality must formally accept the delegation by creating bylaws for water regulation.”
Glebe Mountain Wind Energy, LLC (Vt. Super. Ct. 2006). “10 V.S.A. Section 1424[a] and Section 6086, 1–8 and 9, that’s your criteria 1–10 of Act 250 and that’s where .”
Glebe Mountain Wind Energy, LLC (Vt. Super. Ct. 2006). “10 V.S.A. Section 1424[a] and Section 6086, 1–8 and 9, that’s your criteria 1–10 of Act 250 and that’s where .”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 1424(c) — 1 case
Beyers v. Water Resources Bd., 2006 VT 65 (Vt. 2006). “Plaintiff asserts that the Board’s decision was contrary to law because the Board failed to follow 10 V.S.A. § 1424(c) and VUPWR § 2.6, which encourage resolution of conflicts in a manner that provides for normal uses to the extent possible.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 1424(e) — 1 case
Beyers v. Water Resources Bd., 2006 VT 65 (Vt. 2006). “Plaintiff asserts that the Board’s decision was contrary to law because the Board failed to follow 10 V.S.A. § 1424(c) and VUPWR § 2.6, which encourage resolution of conflicts in a manner that provides for normal uses to the extent possible.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 1424(f) — 1 case
Svendsen Docket Extension Variance (Vt. Super. Ct. 2009). “10 V.S.A. § 1424(f). The -5- municipality must formally accept the delegation by creating bylaws for water regulation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.