Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 4082 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 002 : REGULATORY POWERS OVER FISH AND WILDLIFE

(Cite as: 10 V.S.A. § 4082)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1982–2025 · leading case: State v. Ronald Dupuis, 197 A.3d 343 (Vt. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Ronald Dupuis, 197 A.3d 343 (Vt. 2018). · cites it 2× “" See 10 V.S.A. § 4082(a) (delegating authority to Fish and Wildlife Board to promulgate rules "for the regulation of fish and wild game and the taking thereof," which "shall be designed to maintain the best health, population, and utilization levels of the regulated species and…”
State v. Teachout, 451 A.2d 819 (Vt. 1982). “The Fish and Game Board derives its power to adopt rules and regulations generally from 10 V.S.A. § 4082, which, at the time in question, provided in pertinent part that: The board is authorized and empowered at any time to determine under what circumstances, when and in what…”
State v. Sullivan, 578 A.2d 639 (Vt. 1990). “§§ 801-849, or whether it was within the power of the Board to promulgate, 10 V.S.A. § 4082. Moreover, V.R.Cr.P. 26.”
State v. Letourneau, 503 A.2d 553 (Vt. 1985). · cites it 2× “The defendants were then charged with, and after a *368 joint trial by jury, convicted of possessing moose in violation of 10 V.S.A. § 4082 and App. § 31(f). Title 10 V.”
Protect Our Wildlife v. Fish & Wildlife (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). “10 V.S.A. § 4082. Plaintiffs do not explain in any cogent way how the definition of trapping in the Rule somehow falls outside these broad delegations of authority.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 4082(a) — 1 case
State v. Ronald Dupuis, 197 A.3d 343 (Vt. 2018). “" See 10 V.S.A. § 4082(a) (delegating authority to Fish and Wildlife Board to promulgate rules "for the regulation of fish and wild game and the taking thereof," which "shall be designed to maintain the best health, population, and utilization levels of the regulated species and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.