Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 10 Chapter 151
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6085 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 004 : PERMITS

(Cite as: 10 V.S.A. § 6085)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 75 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1972–2026 · leading case: In re Diverging Diamond Interchange SW Permit, Diverging Diamond Interchange A250 (R.L. Vallee, Inc. & Timberlake Assocs., LLP, Appellants), 2019 VT 57 (Vt. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re Diverging Diamond Interchange SW Permit, Diverging Diamond Interchange A250 (R.L. Vallee, Inc. & Timberlake Assocs., LLP, Appellants), 2019 VT 57 (Vt. 2019). · cites it 4× “In a March 2017 decision concerning VTrans’s Act 250 permit application, the environmental division denied Vallee party status as a landowner, see 10 V.S.A. § 6085(c)(1)(B), but granted Vallee party status as having a “particularized interest” under Act 250 that might be 2 A…”
In Re Wildlife Wonderland, Inc., 346 A.2d 645 (Vt. 1975). · cites it 8× “10 V.S.A. § 6085 (c). And, for purposes of appeal to the Board, a State agency shall be considered a party.”
In Re Preseault, 292 A.2d 832 (Vt. 1972). · cites it 6× “Under the provisions of 10 V.S.A. § 6085 (a) the adjoining property owners were given the right to appear at the hearing and produce evidence before the District Environmental Commission.”
In re Snowstone Stormwater Discharge Authorization (Michael Harrington, Appellants), 2021 VT 36 (Vt. 2021). · cites it 2× “A “person aggrieved” is one “who alleges an injury to a particularized interest” protected by one or more environmental protection statutes enumerated in § 8503.”
Application of Great E. Bldg. Co., Inc., 326 A.2d 152 (Vt. 1974). · cites it 6× “The appellants argue that they should have been admitted as parties to the hearing provided for in 10 V.S.A. § 6085. *612 Alternatively, they claim party status derived from an in pari materia reading of 8 V.”
In Re Agency of Admin., Etc., 444 A.2d 1349 (Vt. 1982). “10 V.S.A. § 6085. Before a permit is granted, the Board or the district commission must review the plan, and find that the development project will not have an undue adverse effect on any one of a number of criteria, including water quality or supply, air quality, soil…”
In Re Denio, 608 A.2d 1166 (Vt. 1992). “§ 6086(a)(8), that, in the absence of adherence to the conditions, the subdivision would adversely affect the aesthetics of the surrounding area. At no point in the proceedings before the Commission and Board did any party receiving notice of the requested permit and…”
In re Great Waters of Am., Inc., 435 A.2d 956 (Vt. 1981). · cites it 2× “Adjoining landowners, in addition, do not automatically become parties to the proceedings, but must either request a hearing within fifteen days of receipt of notice via 10 V.S.A. § 6085 (a) or petition the district commission in advance of the hearings to be joined as a party…”
In Re Cabot Creamery Coop., Inc., 663 A.2d 940 (Vt. 1995). · cites it 3× “10 V.S.A. §§ 6085(c), 6089(b). 2 In In re George F.”
In Re Killington, Ltd., 616 A.2d 241 (Vt. 1992). “10 V.S.A. § 6085(c). Parties entitled to notice include “a municipality, and municipal and regional planning commissions wherein the land is located, and any adjacent *212 Vermont municipality, municipal or regional planning commission if the land is located on a boundary.”
In re Spencer, 566 A.2d 959 (Vt. 1989). “§ 6086(b), 9 requiring issuance of the District Commission’s findings and decision within twenty days of the final hearing date, to 10 V.S.A. § 6085(d), requiring automatic issuance of a permit when no hearing has been held and a permit has not been granted or denied within…”
In re Stokes Commc'ns Corp., 664 A.2d 712 (Vt. 1995). “” 10 V.S.A. § 6085(c); see also id. § 6089(b) (appeal from decision of board shall be to supreme court as set forth by § 6085(c)).”
Show all 75 citing cases →
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6085(0)(1)(E) — 1 case
Granville Mfg Co., Inc. Act 250 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6085(6) — 2 cases
Bennington Wal Mart (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012).
Bennington Walmart (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6085(a) — 3 cases
In Re Preseault, 292 A.2d 832 (Vt. 1972). “Under the provisions of 10 V.S.A. § 6085 (a) the adjoining property owners were given the right to appear at the hearing and produce evidence before the District Environmental Commission.”
In Re Wildlife Wonderland, Inc., 346 A.2d 645 (Vt. 1975). “10 V.S.A. § 6085 (c). And, for purposes of appeal to the Board, a State agency shall be considered a party.”
Omya, Inc. Act 250 Application (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6085(a)(1) — 1 case
In Re Wildlife Wonderland, Inc., 346 A.2d 645 (Vt. 1975). “10 V.S.A. § 6085 (c). And, for purposes of appeal to the Board, a State agency shall be considered a party.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6085(a)(5) — 1 case
In Re Wildlife Wonderland, Inc., 346 A.2d 645 (Vt. 1975). “10 V.S.A. § 6085 (c). And, for purposes of appeal to the Board, a State agency shall be considered a party.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6085(a)(8)(A) — 1 case
Shires Hous. PUD Amendment/Shires Hous. Inc. Act 250 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6085(c) — 20 cases
In Re Preseault, 292 A.2d 832 (Vt. 1972). “Under the provisions of 10 V.S.A. § 6085 (a) the adjoining property owners were given the right to appear at the hearing and produce evidence before the District Environmental Commission.”
In Re Wildlife Wonderland, Inc., 346 A.2d 645 (Vt. 1975). “10 V.S.A. § 6085 (c). And, for purposes of appeal to the Board, a State agency shall be considered a party.”
In Re Cabot Creamery Coop., Inc., 663 A.2d 940 (Vt. 1995). “10 V.S.A. §§ 6085(c), 6089(b). 2 In In re George F.”
Application of Great E. Bldg. Co., Inc., 326 A.2d 152 (Vt. 1974). “The appellants argue that they should have been admitted as parties to the hearing provided for in 10 V.S.A. § 6085. *612 Alternatively, they claim party status derived from an in pari materia reading of 8 V.”
In Re Killington, Ltd., 616 A.2d 241 (Vt. 1992). “10 V.S.A. § 6085(c). Parties entitled to notice include “a municipality, and municipal and regional planning commissions wherein the land is located, and any adjacent *212 Vermont municipality, municipal or regional planning commission if the land is located on a boundary.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6085(c)(1) — 11 cases
Brennan Woods Ltd. P'ship v. Town of Williston, 782 A.2d 1230 (Vt. 2001).
In Re Ochs, 2006 VT 34 (Vt. 2006).
Lamoille Valley Rail Trail Act 250 JO (Reconsidered) (Vt. Super. Ct. 2010).
Bennington Walmart (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012).
Morgan Meadows/Black Dog Realty Subdivision Act 250 Permit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2008).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6085(c)(1)(A) — 2 cases
Lamoille Valley Rail Trail Act 250 JO (Reconsidered) (Vt. Super. Ct. 2010).
E. E. Buttolph Revocable Trust Act 250 Abandonment Petition (Vt. Super. Ct. 2009).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6085(c)(1)(B) — 3 cases
In re Diverging Diamond Interchange SW Permit, Diverging Diamond Interchange A250 (R.L. Vallee, Inc. & Timberlake Assocs., LLP, Appellants), 2019 VT 57 (Vt. 2019). “In a March 2017 decision concerning VTrans’s Act 250 permit application, the environmental division denied Vallee party status as a landowner, see 10 V.S.A. § 6085(c)(1)(B), but granted Vallee party status as having a “particularized interest” under Act 250 that might be 2 A…”
Diverging Diamond Act 250 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017).
Diverging Diamond Act 250 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6085(c)(1)(C) — 2 cases
Killington Vill. Master Plan Act 250 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014).
NRB LU Panel v. Dodge (Vt. Super. Ct. 2008).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6085(c)(1)(E) — 39 cases
In re Snowstone Stormwater Discharge Authorization (Michael Harrington, Appellants), 2021 VT 36 (Vt. 2021). “A “person aggrieved” is one “who alleges an injury to a particularized interest” protected by one or more environmental protection statutes enumerated in § 8503.”
In re North East Materials Grp., LLC Amended Act 250 Permit (Russell Austin, Pamela Austin, Julie Barre, Marc Bernier, Collectively, Neighbors for Healthy Communities, Appellants), 174 A.3d 747 (Vt. 2017).
In Re Burchard Road Petition to Abandon Land Use Permit Denial (Myrna Nathin, Appellant), 2024 VT 51 (Vt. 2024).
Tyler Bridge Road Permit Amendment Application - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026).
Founder's Hall Act 250 Appeal - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2020).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6085(c)(1)(e) — 1 case
JLD Prop. St. Albans Wal Mart (Vt. Super. Ct. 2010).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6085(c)(2) — 2 cases
Lamoille Valley Rail Trail Act 250 JO (Reconsidered) (Vt. Super. Ct. 2010).
Ne. Materials Broup LLC Amended Permit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6085(c)(2)(A) — 1 case
Tyler Bridge Road Permit Amendment Application - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6085(c)(5) — 8 cases
In re Diverging Diamond Interchange SW Permit, Diverging Diamond Interchange A250 (R.L. Vallee, Inc. & Timberlake Assocs., LLP, Appellants), 2019 VT 57 (Vt. 2019). “In a March 2017 decision concerning VTrans’s Act 250 permit application, the environmental division denied Vallee party status as a landowner, see 10 V.S.A. § 6085(c)(1)(B), but granted Vallee party status as having a “particularized interest” under Act 250 that might be 2 A…”
Killington Vill. Master Plan Act 250 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2016).
Killington Vill. Master Plan Act 250 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014).
Bennington Walmart (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012).
Killington Vill. Master Plan Act 250 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2016).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6085(c)(6) — 7 cases
In re Diverging Diamond Interchange SW Permit, Diverging Diamond Interchange A250 (R.L. Vallee, Inc. & Timberlake Assocs., LLP, Appellants), 2019 VT 57 (Vt. 2019). “In a March 2017 decision concerning VTrans’s Act 250 permit application, the environmental division denied Vallee party status as a landowner, see 10 V.S.A. § 6085(c)(1)(B), but granted Vallee party status as having a “particularized interest” under Act 250 that might be 2 A…”
Snyder Grp., Inc. Act 250 - Decision on Motions (Vt. Super. Ct. 2019).
Capitol Plaza Act 250 - Decision on Motions (Vt. Super. Ct. 2019).
Ne. Materials Broup LLC Amended Permit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013).
Bennington Wal Mart (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6085(c)(l) — 1 case
Granville Mfg Co., Inc. Act 250 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6085(d) — 1 case
In re Spencer, 566 A.2d 959 (Vt. 1989). “§ 6086(b), 9 requiring issuance of the District Commission’s findings and decision within twenty days of the final hearing date, to 10 V.S.A. § 6085(d), requiring automatic issuance of a permit when no hearing has been held and a permit has not been granted or denied within…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6085(f) — 1 case
Appeal of Lussier (Vt. Super. Ct. 2006).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.