(a) The developed world continues to pollute the environment and add to the depletion
of the world’s resources by burning and burying resources as waste. Furthermore,
inefficient and improper methods of managing solid and hazardous waste result in scenic
blights, hazards to the public health, cause pollution of air and water resources,
increase the numbers of rodents and vectors of disease, have an adverse effect on
land values, create public nuisances, and otherwise interfere with proper community
life and development.
(b) The overall problems of solid waste management have become a matter statewide in scope
and in concern and necessitate State action through planning, financial, and technical
assistance and regulation to reduce the amount of waste generated and to promote environmentally
acceptable and economical means of waste management.
(c) The generators of waste should pay disposal costs that reflect the real costs to society
of waste management and disposal.
(d) [Repealed.]
(e) It is the purpose of this chapter that the State provide technical and financial leadership
to municipalities for the siting of solid waste management facilities and the implementation
of a program for the management and reduction of wastes that over the long term is
sustainable, environmentally sound, and economically beneficial and that encourages
innovation and individual responsibility. The Program should give priority to reducing
the waste stream through recycling and through the reduction of nonbiodegradable and
hazardous ingredients. (Added 1977, No. 106, § 1; amended 1987, No. 78, § 1.)
Chittenden Solid Waste Dist. v. Hinesburg Sand & Gravel Co., 730 A.2d 614 (Vt. 1999). · cites it 4דSee 10 V.S.A. § 6601. The intended effect was to establish “a comprehensive state-wide strategy for the management of waste” in Vermont, see 10 V.”
Gade v. Chittenden Solid Waste Dist., 2009 VT 107 (Vt. 2009). “The above statutory provisions indicate the Legislature’s intent to support long-term contracts between municipalities and third parties for the management of waste disposal. Indeed, the purpose of these statutes is to encourage towns to develop long-term plans for the disposal…”
State of Vt. v. Staco, Inc., 684 F. Supp. 822 (D. Vt. 1988). “Pendent jurisdiction is asserted to adjudicate state claims under the provisions of the Vermont Waste Management Act, 10 V.S.A. § 6601, et seq. related Vermont statutory enactments, and the common law of nuisance.”
State v. Carroll, 765 A.2d 500 (Vt. 2000). “See 10 V.S.A. § 6601(c) (declaration of policy and purpose stating, “[t]he generators of waste should pay disposal costs that reflect the real costs to society of waste management and disposal.”
State v. Carroll, 765 A.2d 500 (Vt. 2000). “See 10 V.S.A. § 6601(c) (declaration of policy and purpose stating, “[t]he generators of waste should pay disposal costs that reflect the real costs to society of waste management and disposal.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6601(e) — 2 cases
Gade v. Chittenden Solid Waste Dist., 2009 VT 107 (Vt. 2009). “The above statutory provisions indicate the Legislature’s intent to support long-term contracts between municipalities and third parties for the management of waste disposal. Indeed, the purpose of these statutes is to encourage towns to develop long-term plans for the disposal…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.