Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8503 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 10 V.S.A. § 8503)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 32 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 2006–2025 · leading case: In re Mountain Top Inn & Resort, JO 1-391 (Katherine Hall, Appellant), 2020 VT 57 (Vt. 2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re Mountain Top Inn & Resort, JO 1-391 (Katherine Hall, Appellant), 2020 VT 57 (Vt. 2020). · cites it 3× “Hall specifically argued that the Environmental Division did not have the authority to rule on the lawfulness of Rule 2(C)(1)(a); rather, she argued that under 10 V.S.A. § 8503(e) the Civil Division of the “Washington Superior Court ha[d] exclusive jurisdiction to entertain a…”
Plum Creek Maine Timberlands, LLC v. Vermont Dep't of Forests, Parks & Rec. & Vermont Dep't of Taxes, 2016 VT 103 (Vt. 2016). · cites it 2× “See 10 V.S.A. § 8503(a). Despite the presence of de novo review, the PSB is required to apply the “substantive standards” applicable to ANR, including any discretion ANR has in determining whether to issue a permit.”
In Re Shenandoah LLC, 2011 VT 68 (Vt. 2011). · cites it 2× “10 V.S.A. § 8503(b)(2); id. § 8504(h); V.”
In Re DJK, LLC WW & WS Permit (Ralph Crowley & Joanne Crowley, Appellants), 2024 VT 34 (Vt. 2024). “” 10 V.S.A. § 8503(a)(1)(K). Chapter 64 conversely states that “[a]ppeals of any act or decision of the Department under this subchapter shall be made in accordance with chapter 220 of this title.”
In re Route 103 Quarry, 2007 VT 66 (Vt. 2007). “” 10 V.S.A. § 8503(d). One of the express purposes of the chapter is to “[standardize .”
In Re Guillemette ZA Determination Appeal (Anne Guillemette & Mark Guillemette, Appellants), 2025 VT 25 (Vt. 2025). · cites it 3× “, 10 V.S.A. § 8503(a) (providing that chapter 220 shall govern all appeals 10 from act or decision of Secretary of Natural Resources, “excluding enforcement actions under chapters 201 and 211 of this title”); id.”
NEWSVT Declaratory Ruling Appeal - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). · cites it 5× “§ 34 expressly stating such jurisdiction, nor is there any provision in 10 V.S.A. § 8503 expressly granting jurisdiction.”
R.L. Vallee, Inc.et Al MS4 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017). · cites it 2× “10 V.S.A. § 8503(a). Vallee responds that this appeal is brought pursuant to title 10, chapter 47—not chapter 201.”
Champlain Parkway SW Discharge Permit - Decision on Motion (Dismiss) (Vt. Super. Ct. 2019). · cites it 2× “Our appellate jurisdiction is limited by 10 V.S.A. § 8503(a)(1), which narrows appealable ANR permit decisions to those made under specific chapters of Title 10.”
Bradford Oil Properety \CAP\"" (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014). · cites it 2× “The Agency argues that the CAP is expressly exempted by 10 V.S.A. § 8503(a). Section 8503(a) excludes enforcement actions under Title 10 Chapters 201 (administrative enforcement) or 211 (civil enforcement) from § 8503(a) jurisdiction.”
Champlain Marina, Inc. Dock Expansion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2009). · cites it 2× “One of the provisions specifically listed in 10 V.S.A. § 8503 is “29 V.S.A. chapter 11 (management of lakes and ponds).”
Unified Buddhist Church, Inc. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2007). · cites it 2× “To qualify as a “person aggrieved,” VNRC must show that it “alleges an injury to a particularized interest protected by the provisions of law listed in [10 V.S.A. § 8503], attributable to [the decision on appeal] that can be redressed by the environmental court .”
Show all 32 citing cases →
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8503(7) — 1 case
Unified Buddhist Church, Inc. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2007). “To qualify as a “person aggrieved,” VNRC must show that it “alleges an injury to a particularized interest protected by the provisions of law listed in [10 V.S.A. § 8503], attributable to [the decision on appeal] that can be redressed by the environmental court .”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8503(a) — 6 cases
Plum Creek Maine Timberlands, LLC v. Vermont Dep't of Forests, Parks & Rec. & Vermont Dep't of Taxes, 2016 VT 103 (Vt. 2016). “See 10 V.S.A. § 8503(a). Despite the presence of de novo review, the PSB is required to apply the “substantive standards” applicable to ANR, including any discretion ANR has in determining whether to issue a permit.”
In Re Guillemette ZA Determination Appeal (Anne Guillemette & Mark Guillemette, Appellants), 2025 VT 25 (Vt. 2025). “, 10 V.S.A. § 8503(a) (providing that chapter 220 shall govern all appeals 10 from act or decision of Secretary of Natural Resources, “excluding enforcement actions under chapters 201 and 211 of this title”); id.”
Bradford Oil Properety \CAP\"" (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014). “The Agency argues that the CAP is expressly exempted by 10 V.S.A. § 8503(a). Section 8503(a) excludes enforcement actions under Title 10 Chapters 201 (administrative enforcement) or 211 (civil enforcement) from § 8503(a) jurisdiction.”
R.L. Vallee, Inc.et Al MS4 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017). “10 V.S.A. § 8503(a). Vallee responds that this appeal is brought pursuant to title 10, chapter 47—not chapter 201.”
Aberth v. Dec (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8503(a)(1) — 1 case
Champlain Parkway SW Discharge Permit - Decision on Motion (Dismiss) (Vt. Super. Ct. 2019). “Our appellate jurisdiction is limited by 10 V.S.A. § 8503(a)(1), which narrows appealable ANR permit decisions to those made under specific chapters of Title 10.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8503(a)(1)(B) — 1 case
Lake Bomoseen Ass'n & LBPT Denial - Decision on Motions (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8503(a)(1)(E) — 4 cases
NEWSVT Declaratory Ruling Appeal - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). “§ 34 expressly stating such jurisdiction, nor is there any provision in 10 V.S.A. § 8503 expressly granting jurisdiction.”
R.L. Vallee, Inc.et Al MS4 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017). “10 V.S.A. § 8503(a). Vallee responds that this appeal is brought pursuant to title 10, chapter 47—not chapter 201.”
Champlain Parkway SW Discharge Permit - Decision on Motion (Dismiss) (Vt. Super. Ct. 2019). “Our appellate jurisdiction is limited by 10 V.S.A. § 8503(a)(1), which narrows appealable ANR permit decisions to those made under specific chapters of Title 10.”
ANR v. Stratton Gardens, LLC (Vt. Super. Ct. 2006).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8503(a)(1)(K) — 2 cases
In Re DJK, LLC WW & WS Permit (Ralph Crowley & Joanne Crowley, Appellants), 2024 VT 34 (Vt. 2024). “” 10 V.S.A. § 8503(a)(1)(K). Chapter 64 conversely states that “[a]ppeals of any act or decision of the Department under this subchapter shall be made in accordance with chapter 220 of this title.”
Bibby 5-Lot Final Plat subdivision (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8503(a)(1)(N) — 1 case
Omya Solid Waste Disposal Facility (Vt. Super. Ct. 2009).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8503(a)(2) — 1 case
Champlain Marina, Inc. Dock Expansion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2009). “One of the provisions specifically listed in 10 V.S.A. § 8503 is “29 V.S.A. chapter 11 (management of lakes and ponds).”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8503(b) — 1 case
Weinstein v. Harmon (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8503(b)(2) — 5 cases
In Re Shenandoah LLC, 2011 VT 68 (Vt. 2011). “10 V.S.A. § 8503(b)(2); id. § 8504(h); V.”
Brady Sullivan SV, LLC Act 250 - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2018).
WhistlePig, LLC Act 250 JO (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014).
Lake Champlain Bluegrass Festival JO 6-007 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011).
Marcelino Recycling Facility JO (Vt. Super. Ct. 2007).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8503(c) — 2 cases
In Re Guillemette ZA Determination Appeal (Anne Guillemette & Mark Guillemette, Appellants), 2025 VT 25 (Vt. 2025). “, 10 V.S.A. § 8503(a) (providing that chapter 220 shall govern all appeals 10 from act or decision of Secretary of Natural Resources, “excluding enforcement actions under chapters 201 and 211 of this title”); id.”
Hollow Road 9-Lot PUD - Entry Regarding Motion to Determine Party Status (Vt. Super. Ct. 2018).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8503(d) — 1 case
In re Route 103 Quarry, 2007 VT 66 (Vt. 2007). “” 10 V.S.A. § 8503(d). One of the express purposes of the chapter is to “[standardize .”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8503(e) — 2 cases
In re Mountain Top Inn & Resort, JO 1-391 (Katherine Hall, Appellant), 2020 VT 57 (Vt. 2020). “Hall specifically argued that the Environmental Division did not have the authority to rule on the lawfulness of Rule 2(C)(1)(a); rather, she argued that under 10 V.S.A. § 8503(e) the Civil Division of the “Washington Superior Court ha[d] exclusive jurisdiction to entertain a…”
Mountain Top Inn & Resort JO 1-391 - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2019).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.