Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 11 Chapter 9
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 11, § 1161 (2026)

Repealed. 1997, No. 149 (Adj. Sess.), § 2, eff. Jan. 1, 1999.

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 002 : NATURE OF PARTNERSHIP

(Cite as: 11 V.S.A. § 1161)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1982–1992 · leading case: Concra Corp. v. Andrus, 446 A.2d 363 (Vt. 1982).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Concra Corp. v. Andrus, 446 A.2d 363 (Vt. 1982). · cites it 3× “§ 1161(a) 1 : advertising for the real estate agencies of both defendants was placed with the plaintiff; both defendants used the same telephone number and address; both defendants placed advertising for the same properties; both defendants made payments on account as well as…”
Harman v. Rogers, 510 A.2d 161 (Vt. 1986). “Under Vermont’s version of the Uniform Partnership Act, 11 V.”
Maker v. Bermingham, 592 N.E.2d 1339 (Mass. App. Ct. 1992). “See Vt. Stat. Ann. Tit. 11, § 1161(a); G. L. 108A, § 6(1).”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 11, § 1161(a): 3 cases
Concra Corp. v. Andrus, 446 A.2d 363 (Vt. 1982). “§ 1161(a) 1 : advertising for the real estate agencies of both defendants was placed with the plaintiff; both defendants used the same telephone number and address; both defendants placed advertising for the same properties; both defendants made payments on account as well as…”
Harman v. Rogers, 510 A.2d 161 (Vt. 1986). “Under Vermont’s version of the Uniform Partnership Act, 11 V.”
Maker v. Bermingham, 592 N.E.2d 1339 (Mass. App. Ct. 1992). “See Vt. Stat. Ann. Tit. 11, § 1161(a); G. L. 108A, § 6(1).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.