Notes of Decisions
Garrett M. Cornelius v. The Chronicle, Inc., 206 A.3d 710 (Vt. 2019).
· cites it 10× “These consolidated cases raise issues concerning Vermont's anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) statute, 12 V.S.A. § 1041. Plaintiff Garrett Cornelius filed suit alleging invasion of privacy by newspaper, The Chronicle, after newspaper published two…”
Ernst v. Carrigan, 814 F.3d 116 (2d Cir. 2016).
· cites it 7× “Supeno’s claims pursuant to Vermont’s anti-SLAPP statute, 12 V.S.A. § 1041. The motions sought to strike allegations relating to: (i) the April 2011 letter, (ii) the statements made before the Selectboard, (iii) the document presented to the Selectboard, and (iv) the letter to…”
Draxxion Talandar v. Elizabeth Manchester-Murphy, 2024 VT 86 (Vt. 2024).
· cites it 13× “Plaintiff Draxxion Talandar appeals from a civil division order granting judgment on the pleadings to defendant Elizabeth Manchester-Murphy and awarding her attorney’s fees under Vermont’s anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) statute, 12 V.S.A. § 1041. In…”
Soojung Jang v. Trs. of St. Johnsbury Acad., 331 F. Supp. 3d 312 (D. Vt. 2018).
· cites it 14× “) Presently before the Court is the Academy and KDC's Joint Motion to Strike the Complaint pursuant to Vermont's anti-SLAPP statute, Vt. Stat. Ann. Tit. 12, § 1041 (2006), (Doc.”
Kyle Wolfe v. VT Digger, 2023 VT 50 (Vt. 2023).
· cites it 7× “It is now well-settled under our law that when a defendant files both a motion to dismiss and a special motion to strike the complaint under 12 V.S.A. § 1041, “granting [the] motion to dismiss does not moot the motion to strike because the issue of attorney’s fees remains a live…”
Kristina J. Polak & Stephen M. Polak v. Felipe Ramirez-Diaz & Yesica Sanchez, 2025 VT 9 (Vt. 2025).
· cites it 7× “Plaintiffs appeal the trial court’s order granting defendants’ special motion to strike plaintiffs’ claims of defamation, malicious prosecution, and intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED) pursuant to Vermont’s anti-SLAPP law, 12 V.S.A. § 1041. Plaintiffs also…”
Coomer v. Make Your Life Epic, 98 F.4th 1320 (10th Cir. 2024).
“at 120 (quoting Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 1041 (e)). Because such an “analysis is entangled in the facts,” the court ruled that the denial of motions to dismiss under anti-SLAPP statutes are “not ‘completely separate from the merits’ of a plaintiff’s action,” and thus are not…”
Ernst v. Kauffman, 50 F. Supp. 3d 553 (2014).
· cites it 10× “48), respectively, to strike plaintiffs’ complaint pursu *557 ant to Vermont’s anti-SLAPP statute, 12 V.S.A. § 1041. The third is a motion to dismiss Count IV of plaintiffs’ amended complaint on the grounds that it is barred by the statute of limitations, filed by defendants…”
polak v. ramirez-diaz (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024).
· cites it 12× “Sanchez, and one count of defamation, one count of intentional iniction of emotional distress, and one count of malicious prosecution against both DefendantsA hearing was held on the special motion to strike on June 16, 2021.”
talander v. manchester-murphy (Vt. Super. Ct. 2023).
· cites it 8× “She also contends that this lawsuit should be characterized as a “strategic lawsuit against public participation,” and that the complaint should be dismissed under the provisions of 12 V.S.A. § 1041. In response, plaintiff contends that: (1) the absolute privilege does not apply…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 1041(a) — 25 cases
Garrett M. Cornelius v. The Chronicle, Inc., 206 A.3d 710 (Vt. 2019).
“These consolidated cases raise issues concerning Vermont's anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) statute, 12 V.S.A. § 1041. Plaintiff Garrett Cornelius filed suit alleging invasion of privacy by newspaper, The Chronicle, after newspaper published two…”
Draxxion Talandar v. Elizabeth Manchester-Murphy, 2024 VT 86 (Vt. 2024).
“Plaintiff Draxxion Talandar appeals from a civil division order granting judgment on the pleadings to defendant Elizabeth Manchester-Murphy and awarding her attorney’s fees under Vermont’s anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) statute, 12 V.S.A. § 1041. In…”
Kyle Wolfe v. VT Digger, 2023 VT 50 (Vt. 2023).
“It is now well-settled under our law that when a defendant files both a motion to dismiss and a special motion to strike the complaint under 12 V.S.A. § 1041, “granting [the] motion to dismiss does not moot the motion to strike because the issue of attorney’s fees remains a live…”
Ernst v. Carrigan, 814 F.3d 116 (2d Cir. 2016).
“Supeno’s claims pursuant to Vermont’s anti-SLAPP statute, 12 V.S.A. § 1041. The motions sought to strike allegations relating to: (i) the April 2011 letter, (ii) the statements made before the Selectboard, (iii) the document presented to the Selectboard, and (iv) the letter to…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 1041(b) — 1 case
Ernst v. Kauffman, 50 F. Supp. 3d 553 (2014).
“48), respectively, to strike plaintiffs’ complaint pursu *557 ant to Vermont’s anti-SLAPP statute, 12 V.S.A. § 1041. The third is a motion to dismiss Count IV of plaintiffs’ amended complaint on the grounds that it is barred by the statute of limitations, filed by defendants…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 1041(c) — 1 case
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 1041(c)(1) — 2 cases
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 1041(c)(2) — 1 case
talander v. manchester-murphy (Vt. Super. Ct. 2023).
“She also contends that this lawsuit should be characterized as a “strategic lawsuit against public participation,” and that the complaint should be dismissed under the provisions of 12 V.S.A. § 1041. In response, plaintiff contends that: (1) the absolute privilege does not apply…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 1041(d) — 5 cases
Garrett M. Cornelius v. The Chronicle, Inc., 206 A.3d 710 (Vt. 2019).
“These consolidated cases raise issues concerning Vermont's anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) statute, 12 V.S.A. § 1041. Plaintiff Garrett Cornelius filed suit alleging invasion of privacy by newspaper, The Chronicle, after newspaper published two…”
Draxxion Talandar v. Elizabeth Manchester-Murphy, 2024 VT 86 (Vt. 2024).
“Plaintiff Draxxion Talandar appeals from a civil division order granting judgment on the pleadings to defendant Elizabeth Manchester-Murphy and awarding her attorney’s fees under Vermont’s anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) statute, 12 V.S.A. § 1041. In…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 1041(e) — 4 cases
Ernst v. Carrigan, 814 F.3d 116 (2d Cir. 2016).
“Supeno’s claims pursuant to Vermont’s anti-SLAPP statute, 12 V.S.A. § 1041. The motions sought to strike allegations relating to: (i) the April 2011 letter, (ii) the statements made before the Selectboard, (iii) the document presented to the Selectboard, and (iv) the letter to…”
Draxxion Talandar v. Elizabeth Manchester-Murphy, 2024 VT 86 (Vt. 2024).
“Plaintiff Draxxion Talandar appeals from a civil division order granting judgment on the pleadings to defendant Elizabeth Manchester-Murphy and awarding her attorney’s fees under Vermont’s anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) statute, 12 V.S.A. § 1041. In…”
talander v. manchester-murphy (Vt. Super. Ct. 2023).
“She also contends that this lawsuit should be characterized as a “strategic lawsuit against public participation,” and that the complaint should be dismissed under the provisions of 12 V.S.A. § 1041. In response, plaintiff contends that: (1) the absolute privilege does not apply…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 1041(e)(1) — 4 cases
Ernst v. Kauffman, 50 F. Supp. 3d 553 (2014).
“48), respectively, to strike plaintiffs’ complaint pursu *557 ant to Vermont’s anti-SLAPP statute, 12 V.S.A. § 1041. The third is a motion to dismiss Count IV of plaintiffs’ amended complaint on the grounds that it is barred by the statute of limitations, filed by defendants…”
talander v. manchester-murphy (Vt. Super. Ct. 2023).
“She also contends that this lawsuit should be characterized as a “strategic lawsuit against public participation,” and that the complaint should be dismissed under the provisions of 12 V.S.A. § 1041. In response, plaintiff contends that: (1) the absolute privilege does not apply…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 1041(e)(1)(A) — 6 cases
Garrett M. Cornelius v. The Chronicle, Inc., 206 A.3d 710 (Vt. 2019).
“These consolidated cases raise issues concerning Vermont's anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) statute, 12 V.S.A. § 1041. Plaintiff Garrett Cornelius filed suit alleging invasion of privacy by newspaper, The Chronicle, after newspaper published two…”
Draxxion Talandar v. Elizabeth Manchester-Murphy, 2024 VT 86 (Vt. 2024).
“Plaintiff Draxxion Talandar appeals from a civil division order granting judgment on the pleadings to defendant Elizabeth Manchester-Murphy and awarding her attorney’s fees under Vermont’s anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) statute, 12 V.S.A. § 1041. In…”
Ernst v. Carrigan, 814 F.3d 116 (2d Cir. 2016).
“Supeno’s claims pursuant to Vermont’s anti-SLAPP statute, 12 V.S.A. § 1041. The motions sought to strike allegations relating to: (i) the April 2011 letter, (ii) the statements made before the Selectboard, (iii) the document presented to the Selectboard, and (iv) the letter to…”
Kyle Wolfe v. VT Digger, 2023 VT 50 (Vt. 2023).
“It is now well-settled under our law that when a defendant files both a motion to dismiss and a special motion to strike the complaint under 12 V.S.A. § 1041, “granting [the] motion to dismiss does not moot the motion to strike because the issue of attorney’s fees remains a live…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 1041(e)(2) — 4 cases
Ernst v. Carrigan, 814 F.3d 116 (2d Cir. 2016).
“Supeno’s claims pursuant to Vermont’s anti-SLAPP statute, 12 V.S.A. § 1041. The motions sought to strike allegations relating to: (i) the April 2011 letter, (ii) the statements made before the Selectboard, (iii) the document presented to the Selectboard, and (iv) the letter to…”
Draxxion Talandar v. Elizabeth Manchester-Murphy, 2024 VT 86 (Vt. 2024).
“Plaintiff Draxxion Talandar appeals from a civil division order granting judgment on the pleadings to defendant Elizabeth Manchester-Murphy and awarding her attorney’s fees under Vermont’s anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) statute, 12 V.S.A. § 1041. In…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 1041(e)(l) — 1 case
polak v. ramirez-diaz (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024).
“Sanchez, and one count of defamation, one count of intentional iniction of emotional distress, and one count of malicious prosecution against both DefendantsA hearing was held on the special motion to strike on June 16, 2021.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 1041(f) — 1 case
Kyle Wolfe v. VT Digger, 2023 VT 50 (Vt. 2023).
“It is now well-settled under our law that when a defendant files both a motion to dismiss and a special motion to strike the complaint under 12 V.S.A. § 1041, “granting [the] motion to dismiss does not moot the motion to strike because the issue of attorney’s fees remains a live…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 1041(f)(1) — 13 cases
Garrett M. Cornelius v. The Chronicle, Inc., 206 A.3d 710 (Vt. 2019).
“These consolidated cases raise issues concerning Vermont's anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) statute, 12 V.S.A. § 1041. Plaintiff Garrett Cornelius filed suit alleging invasion of privacy by newspaper, The Chronicle, after newspaper published two…”
Kyle Wolfe v. VT Digger, 2023 VT 50 (Vt. 2023).
“It is now well-settled under our law that when a defendant files both a motion to dismiss and a special motion to strike the complaint under 12 V.S.A. § 1041, “granting [the] motion to dismiss does not moot the motion to strike because the issue of attorney’s fees remains a live…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 1041(g) — 2 cases
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 1041(i) — 7 cases
polak v. ramirez-diaz (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024).
“Sanchez, and one count of defamation, one count of intentional iniction of emotional distress, and one count of malicious prosecution against both DefendantsA hearing was held on the special motion to strike on June 16, 2021.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 1041(i)(1) — 1 case
Garrett M. Cornelius v. The Chronicle, Inc., 206 A.3d 710 (Vt. 2019).
“These consolidated cases raise issues concerning Vermont's anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) statute, 12 V.S.A. § 1041. Plaintiff Garrett Cornelius filed suit alleging invasion of privacy by newspaper, The Chronicle, after newspaper published two…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 1041(i)(3) — 2 cases
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 1041(i)(4) — 1 case
polak v. ramirez-diaz (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024).
“Sanchez, and one count of defamation, one count of intentional iniction of emotional distress, and one count of malicious prosecution against both DefendantsA hearing was held on the special motion to strike on June 16, 2021.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 1041(i)(l) — 1 case
Ernst v. Kauffman, 50 F. Supp. 3d 553 (2014).
“48), respectively, to strike plaintiffs’ complaint pursu *557 ant to Vermont’s anti-SLAPP statute, 12 V.S.A. § 1041. The third is a motion to dismiss Count IV of plaintiffs’ amended complaint on the grounds that it is barred by the statute of limitations, filed by defendants…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 1041(t)(1) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.