(a) Before final judgment in civil actions or proceedings in the Superior Courts, an appeal
to the Supreme Court for the determination of questions of law may be taken in such
manner and under such conditions as the Supreme Court may by rule provide.
(b) In its discretion and before final judgment, a Superior Court may permit an appeal
to be taken by the respondent or the State in a criminal cause to the Supreme Court
for determination of questions of law. The Supreme Court shall hear and determine
the questions and render final judgment thereon or remand the proceedings as justice
and the state of the cause may require. (Added 1959, No. 261, § 50; amended 1965, No. 194, § 10, eff. July 1, 1965, operative Feb. 1, 1967; 1971, No. 185 (Adj. Sess.), § 57, eff. March 29, 1972; 1973, No. 193 (Adj. Sess.), § 3, eff. April 9, 1974; 2009, No. 154 (Adj. Sess.), §§ 74, 74a, eff. Feb. 1, 2011.)
In re J.G., 627 A.2d 362 (Vt. 1993). · cites it 2ד* (1989); see 12 V.S.A. § 2386 (Supreme Court may provide rules for taking appeals before final judgment).”
In Re Est. of Davis, 218 A.2d 390 (Vt. 1966). · cites it 8ד§ 2552, it is my belief that the passage, at the same session, of 12 V.S.A. § 2386 is of utmost importance.”
In Re Pyramid Co. of Burlington, 449 A.2d 915 (Vt. 1982). “This Court has also had ample opportunity to deal with the scope of interlocutory appeals under 12 V.S.A. § 2386. See Powers v. State Highway Board, 123 Vt.”
Town of Putney v. Town of Brookline, 225 A.2d 388 (Vt. 1967). · cites it 3דOn January 9, 1966, the defendant filed its notice of appeal under 12 V.S.A. §2386. We suspended consideration of the appeal because of improper certification of the questions of law by the presiding judge alone, since Rule 2A requires certification by the court.”
State v. Jacobs, 472 A.2d 1247 (Vt. 1984). “This is an interlocutory appeal, 12 V.S.A. § 2386(b), V.R.A.P. 5(b) (1), instituted by defendant, a juvenile at the time these proceedings were commenced * , from an order of the district court dated February 26, 1982, denying his motion for transfer of his case to the juvenile…”
Hosp. Inns v. South Burlington R.I., 547 A.2d 1355 (Vt. 1988). “See 12 V.S.A. § 2386(a); V.R.A.P. 5(b). The finality requirement is firmly established by our case law.”
State v. Miner, 258 A.2d 815 (Vt. 1969). “The trial court denied the State’s request to certify the ruling to this Court for intermediate review as provided in 12 V.S.A. § 2386. Thereafter and during the .”
State v. Elwell, 303 A.2d 134 (Vt. 1973). · cites it 2דThe State has agreed to the appeal before final judgment, and the question has been certified here by the trial court by virtue of 12 V.S.A. § 2386. The defendant was charged by information with a violation of 13 V.”
John v. Fernandez, 205 A.2d 552 (Vt. 1964). · cites it 2דUpon request of the plaintiff, the court in its discretion passed the cause to this Court under the provisions of 12 V.S.A. §2386 for a determination of the questions of law sought to be reviewed.”
City of Rutland v. Keiffer, 205 A.2d 400 (Vt. 1964). “The defendants were granted leave to appeal from the decree before final judgment (12 V.S.A. §2386) and the above questions were certified to this court for review.”
State v. Wetherbee, 2004 VT 101 (Vt. 2004). “5(b); see also 12 V.S.A. § 2386 (providing the Supreme Court with jurisdiction over interlocutory appeals).”
In Re Est. of Johnson, 613 A.2d 703 (Vt. 1992). “) 12 V.S.A. § 2386(a) states: “Before final judgment in civil actions or proceedings in the county courts, the probate courts, or the district court, [an] appeal to the supreme court for the determination of questions of law may be taken in such manner and under such conditions…”
Hosp. Inns v. South Burlington R.I., 547 A.2d 1355 (Vt. 1988). “See 12 V.S.A. § 2386(a); V.R.A.P. 5(b). The finality requirement is firmly established by our case law.”
In Re Est. of Johnson, 613 A.2d 703 (Vt. 1992). “) 12 V.S.A. § 2386(a) states: “Before final judgment in civil actions or proceedings in the county courts, the probate courts, or the district court, [an] appeal to the supreme court for the determination of questions of law may be taken in such manner and under such conditions…”
State v. Jacobs, 472 A.2d 1247 (Vt. 1984). “This is an interlocutory appeal, 12 V.S.A. § 2386(b), V.R.A.P. 5(b) (1), instituted by defendant, a juvenile at the time these proceedings were commenced * , from an order of the district court dated February 26, 1982, denying his motion for transfer of his case to the juvenile…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.