Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 3291 (2026)

Service of copies of attachment

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 003 : ATTACHMENT OF REAL PROPERTY

(Cite as: 12 V.S.A. § 3291)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1963–1986 · leading case: Batchelder v. Mantak, 392 A.2d 945 (Vt. 1978).
Batchelder v. Mantak, 392 A.2d 945 (Vt. 1978). · cites it 2× “The plaintiff, who had knowledge of the Mantaks’ Connecticut address, contends that they were served properly when their property in Londonderry was attached and copies of the complaint with a description of the property attached were left with the Town Clerk in Londonr.”
Spaulding v. Cahill, 514 A.2d 714 (Vt. 1986). · cites it 3× “He did not, however, establish on the record that he complied with 12 V.S.A. § 3291, mandating that “a true and attested copy of the attachment, with a description of the estate so attached [be filed] in the office where by law a deed of that estate is required to be recorded.”
Paul v. Barhydt, 196 A.2d 509 (Vt. 1963). “12 V.S.A. §3291 is not available since the record does not show that the defendants reside outside the state.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.