Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 13 Chapter 3
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 101 (2026)

Repealed. 2013, No. 98 (Adj. Sess.), § 1, eff. March. 24, 2014.

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 13 V.S.A. § 101)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1970–2012 · leading case: Jennie McCormack v. Mark Hiedeman, 694 F.3d 1004 (9th Cir. 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Jennie McCormack v. Mark Hiedeman, 694 F.3d 1004 (9th Cir. 2012). “5 (2) ("A woman is not criminally liable for (a) seeking to obtain, or obtaining, an abortion that is permitted by this part; or (b) a physician’s failure to com *1012 ply [with specified statutes.”
Beecham v. Leahy, 287 A.2d 836 (Vt. 1972). · cites it 3× “He is prepared to carry out the appropriate medical procedures, on the basis of this diagnosis, but for the expectation of prosecution under 13 V.S.A. § 101: “A person who wilfully administers, advises or causes to be administered anything to a woman pregnant, or supposed by…”
State v. Bartlett, 270 A.2d 168 (Vt. 1970). · cites it 2× “The petitioner pleaded guilty in Chittenden County Court to two charges of procuring an abortion in violation of 13 V.S.A. § 101 and was sentenced to serve a term of three to five years in state prison on each conviction.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.