A person who manufactures or knowingly has in his or her possession any engine, machine,
tool, or implement, adapted and designed for cutting through, forcing or breaking
open any building, room, vault, safe, or other depository, in order to steal therefrom
money or other property, knowing the same to be adapted and designed for such purpose,
with intent to use or employ the same therefor, shall be imprisoned not more than
20 years or fined not more than $10,000.00, or both. (Amended 1971, No. 199 (Adj. Sess.), § 15; 1981, No. 223 (Adj. Sess.), § 23.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1985–2015 · leading case: State v. Warner, 696 P.2d 1052 (Or. 1985).
State v. Warner, 696 P.2d 1052 (Or. 1985). “…in 1907; SD Codified Laws § 22-32-17 (1978), enacted in 1877; Tenn Code Ann § 39-3-408 (1982), enacted in 1858; Vt Stat Ann tit 13, § 1204 (1974), enacted in 1850; Wash Rev Code Ann § 9A.52.060 (1977), enacted in 1893; Wis Stat Ann § 943.12 (West 1982), enacted in 1893.…”
State v. Michael Hughes, No. 2014-174 (Vt. Feb. 6, 2015). · cites it 2ד” 13 V.S.A. § 1204. There being no Vermont model jury instruction on this offense, the State proposed a model jury instruction from Massachusetts, which has a nearly identical statute that also uses the “adapted and designed” language twice in the same manner as the Vermont…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.