Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 13 Chapter 59
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 2606 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : LEWD AND INDECENT CONDUCT

(Cite as: 13 V.S.A. § 2606)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2019–2024 · leading case: State v. Rebekah S. VanBuren, 2018 VT 95 (Vt. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Rebekah S. VanBuren, 2018 VT 95 (Vt. 2019). · cites it 16× “13 V.S.A. § 2606. We conclude that the statute is constitutional on its face and grant the State’s petition for extraordinary relief.”
People v. Austin, 2019 IL 123910 (Ill. 2019). · cites it 3× “Codified Laws § 22-21-4 (2018); Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 2606 (b)(1) (2018).”
Ava Morton v. Mayah Young, 2023 VT 29 (Vt. 2023). · cites it 2× “4 In VanBuren, we held that Vermont’s statute criminalizing disclosure of nonconsensual pornography, 13 V.S.A. § 2606, did not violate the First Amendment.”
People v. Austin, 2019 IL 123910 (Ill. 2020). · cites it 2× “VanBuren, 2018 VT 95, ¶ 5 (quoting Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 2606 (b)(1) (2015)).”
corriveau v. windham (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). “The complaint concludes by highlighting that Plaintiffs are requesting this court (1) “[d]eclare that Defendants are violating the Plaintiffs’ children their rights under the Vermont Constitution by not affording them a substantially equal educational opportunity afforded other…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 2606(a)(3) — 1 case
State v. Rebekah S. VanBuren, 2018 VT 95 (Vt. 2019). “13 V.S.A. § 2606. We conclude that the statute is constitutional on its face and grant the State’s petition for extraordinary relief.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 2606(b)(1) — 1 case
State v. Rebekah S. VanBuren, 2018 VT 95 (Vt. 2019). “13 V.S.A. § 2606. We conclude that the statute is constitutional on its face and grant the State’s petition for extraordinary relief.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 2606(b)(2) — 1 case
State v. Rebekah S. VanBuren, 2018 VT 95 (Vt. 2019). “13 V.S.A. § 2606. We conclude that the statute is constitutional on its face and grant the State’s petition for extraordinary relief.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 2606(d)(1) — 1 case
State v. Rebekah S. VanBuren, 2018 VT 95 (Vt. 2019). “13 V.S.A. § 2606. We conclude that the statute is constitutional on its face and grant the State’s petition for extraordinary relief.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 2606(e) — 1 case
State v. Rebekah S. VanBuren, 2018 VT 95 (Vt. 2019). “13 V.S.A. § 2606. We conclude that the statute is constitutional on its face and grant the State’s petition for extraordinary relief.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 2606(e)(2) — 1 case
corriveau v. windham (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). “The complaint concludes by highlighting that Plaintiffs are requesting this court (1) “[d]eclare that Defendants are violating the Plaintiffs’ children their rights under the Vermont Constitution by not affording them a substantially equal educational opportunity afforded other…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.