A person not standing in the relation of husband, wife, parent, grandparent, child,
grandchild, brother, or sister, by consanguinity or affinity, to an offender, who,
after the commission of a felony, harbors, conceals, maintains, or assists such offender
with intent that he or she shall avoid or escape arrest or punishment therefor, shall
be imprisoned not more than seven years or fined not more than $1,000.00, or both. (Amended 1971, No. 199 (Adj. Sess.), § 15; 1981, No. 223 (Adj. Sess.), § 23.)
State v. Williams, 451 A.2d 1142 (Vt. 1982). · cites it 10דThe defendant appeals from his conviction for being an accessory after the fact to a homicide in violation of 13 V.S.A. § 5. We reverse. The defendant and the State entered into a plea agreement, which provided that the defendant would plead guilty to the offense of accessory…”
Woodmansee v. Stoneman, 344 A.2d 26 (Vt. 1975). · cites it 2דAppellant Woodmansee was charged below with violation of 13 V.S.A. § 5, by assisting one Frank Berard to avoid arrest and punishment for the crime of murder.”
State v. Davignon, 565 A.2d 1301 (Vt. 1989). “§ 608(b), and acting as an accessory after the fact, 13 V.S.A. § 5. On November 21st, defendant gave notice of his intent to pursue the affirmative defense of insanity and to offer expert testimony on whether he had the requisite mental state for the offense charged.”
State v. Kelley, 664 A.2d 708 (Vt. 1995). “In his proposed instructions, during the charge conference, and after the jury retired, defendant requested an instruction on the crime of accessory after the fact.”
State v. Shawn Bulson, 2024 VT 15 (Vt. 2024). · cites it 2דOn the night of February 2, 2022, John Pena-Baez, Joerick Johnson, and Chris Morgan shot and killed Isiah Rodriguez in Danby, Vermont.”
State v. Ritchie, 473 A.2d 1164 (Vt. 1984). “§ 2561, and one count of assisting a felon with the intent that the felon avoid arrest, a violation of 13 V.S.A. § 5. We agree with the defendant’s contention that the trial court erred in failing to rule on the defendant’s motion to exclude evidence of prior convictions prior…”
State v. Platt, 610 A.2d 139 (Vt. 1992). “13 V.S.A. § 5. On September 5, 1990, counsel for both parties appeared before the court and explained the terms of the plea agreement.”
State v. Woodmansee, 298 A.2d 814 (Vt. 1972). “2, on August 19, 1972, charged with being an accessory after the commission of a felony; namely, first degree murder, a violation of 13 V.S.A. § 5. The court fixed cash bail at $50,000.”
In re Cherie Hyde, 2015 VT 106 (Vt. 2015). “In contrast, 13 V.S.A. § 5, enacted as part of the same bill that established 13 V.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.