Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 5253 (2026)

Powers and duties

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 003 : OFFICE OF DEFENDER GENERAL

(Cite as: 13 V.S.A. § 5253)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1975–2010 · leading case: In Re Bailey, 2009 VT 122 (Vt. 2009).
In Re Bailey, 2009 VT 122 (Vt. 2009). · cites it 2× “13 V.S.A. § 5253(a); Russell v. Armitage, 166 Vt.”
Kuehne v. Hogan, 321 S.W.3d 337 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “The Legislature acknowledged the potential problem by providing in 13 V.S.A. § 5253(a) that "no other official or agency of the state may supervise the defender general or assign [the defender general] duties in addition to those prescribed by this chapter.”
Hohman v. Hogan, 458 F. Supp. 669 (D. Vt. 1978). “He has also been ably represented by the staff of the state defender general in the present proceedings in keeping with the provisions of 13 V.S.A. § 5253(a): The defender general has the primary responsibility for providing needy persons with legal services .”
Reed v. Glynn, 724 A.2d 464 (Vt. 1998). “See 13 V.S.A. § 5253. Defendant, a private attorney, contracted with the defender general to provide representation to indigent defendants in Windsor County in cases in which the public defender is disqualified by a conflict of interest or is otherwise not available.”
Bradshaw v. Joseph, 666 A.2d 1175 (Vt. 1995). “The Legislature acknowledged the potential problem by providing in 13 V.S.A. § 5253(a) that “[n]o other official or agency of the state may supervise the defender general or assign [the defender general] duties in addition to those prescribed by this chapter.”
Rebideau v. Stoneman, 398 F. Supp. 805 (D. Vt. 1975). “To fill this shortage, Vermont, by statute, 13 V.S.A. § 5253 (1974), has mandated that the State Defender General shall provide legal services to persons in custody of the commissioner of corrections.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 5253(a) — 4 cases
In Re Bailey, 2009 VT 122 (Vt. 2009). “13 V.S.A. § 5253(a); Russell v. Armitage, 166 Vt.”
Kuehne v. Hogan, 321 S.W.3d 337 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010). “The Legislature acknowledged the potential problem by providing in 13 V.S.A. § 5253(a) that "no other official or agency of the state may supervise the defender general or assign [the defender general] duties in addition to those prescribed by this chapter.”
Hohman v. Hogan, 458 F. Supp. 669 (D. Vt. 1978). “He has also been ably represented by the staff of the state defender general in the present proceedings in keeping with the provisions of 13 V.S.A. § 5253(a): The defender general has the primary responsibility for providing needy persons with legal services .”
Bradshaw v. Joseph, 666 A.2d 1175 (Vt. 1995). “The Legislature acknowledged the potential problem by providing in 13 V.S.A. § 5253(a) that “[n]o other official or agency of the state may supervise the defender general or assign [the defender general] duties in addition to those prescribed by this chapter.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.