Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 14 Chapter 111
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 14, § 2671 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 002 : PERSONS FOR WHOM GUARDIANS APPOINTED

(Cite as: 14 V.S.A. § 2671)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2002–2013 · leading case: In re Guardianship of A.S., 2012 VT 70 (Vt. 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re Guardianship of A.S., 2012 VT 70 (Vt. 2012). · cites it 4× “14 V.S.A. § 2671(d)(1) (2002). In a voluntary guardianship proceeding, the court could, in its discretion, order an evaluation of the petitioner; such evaluations were limited to two sets of questions: whether the petitioner was mentally ill or “mentally retarded” and whether…”
Congdon v. Auto. Club Ins., 816 A.2d 504 (Vt. 2002). “14 V.S.A. § 2671. Because no such demonstrations were made, plaintiff, the eighteen-year-old son of Boffa’s domestic partner, cannot reasonably be considered his ward for the purposes of the AAA policy.”
CitiFinancial, Inc. v. Balch, 2013 VT 86 (Vt. 2013). · cites it 3× “” 14 V.S.A. § 2671 (1974). Prior to 1979, the law did not list the potential powers that a guardian could possess.”
CitiFinancial, Inc. v. Balch, 195 Vt. 21 (Vt. 2013). · cites it 3× “” 14 V.S.A. § 2671 (1974). Prior to 1979, the law did not list the potential powers that a guardian could possess.”
Citifinancial, Inc. v. Balch ex rel. Est. of Ballard (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012). · cites it 2× “14 V.S.A. § 2671(a). Doing so involves a serious court process resulting in the transfer of authority to the guardian.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 14, § 2671(a) — 3 cases
CitiFinancial, Inc. v. Balch, 2013 VT 86 (Vt. 2013). “” 14 V.S.A. § 2671 (1974). Prior to 1979, the law did not list the potential powers that a guardian could possess.”
Citifinancial, Inc. v. Balch ex rel. Est. of Ballard (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012). “14 V.S.A. § 2671(a). Doing so involves a serious court process resulting in the transfer of authority to the guardian.”
CitiFinancial, Inc. v. Balch, 195 Vt. 21 (Vt. 2013). “” 14 V.S.A. § 2671 (1974). Prior to 1979, the law did not list the potential powers that a guardian could possess.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 14, § 2671(b)(2) — 2 cases
CitiFinancial, Inc. v. Balch, 2013 VT 86 (Vt. 2013). “” 14 V.S.A. § 2671 (1974). Prior to 1979, the law did not list the potential powers that a guardian could possess.”
CitiFinancial, Inc. v. Balch, 195 Vt. 21 (Vt. 2013). “” 14 V.S.A. § 2671 (1974). Prior to 1979, the law did not list the potential powers that a guardian could possess.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 14, § 2671(d)(1) — 1 case
In re Guardianship of A.S., 2012 VT 70 (Vt. 2012). “14 V.S.A. § 2671(d)(1) (2002). In a voluntary guardianship proceeding, the court could, in its discretion, order an evaluation of the petitioner; such evaluations were limited to two sets of questions: whether the petitioner was mentally ill or “mentally retarded” and whether…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 14, § 2671(d)(2) — 1 case
In re Guardianship of A.S., 2012 VT 70 (Vt. 2012). “14 V.S.A. § 2671(d)(1) (2002). In a voluntary guardianship proceeding, the court could, in its discretion, order an evaluation of the petitioner; such evaluations were limited to two sets of questions: whether the petitioner was mentally ill or “mentally retarded” and whether…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 14, § 2671(e) — 1 case
In re Guardianship of A.S., 2012 VT 70 (Vt. 2012). “14 V.S.A. § 2671(d)(1) (2002). In a voluntary guardianship proceeding, the court could, in its discretion, order an evaluation of the petitioner; such evaluations were limited to two sets of questions: whether the petitioner was mentally ill or “mentally retarded” and whether…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 14, § 2671(f) — 1 case
Citifinancial, Inc. v. Balch ex rel. Est. of Ballard (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012). “14 V.S.A. § 2671(a). Doing so involves a serious court process resulting in the transfer of authority to the guardian.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.