§ 3062. Jurisdiction; review of guardian’s actions
(a) If this State has jurisdiction of a guardianship proceeding pursuant to chapter 114
of this title, then the Probate Division of the Superior Court shall have exclusive
jurisdiction over the proceedings. All proceedings to determine whether this court
has jurisdiction pursuant to chapter 114 of this title shall be brought in the Probate
Division of the Superior Court.
(b) The Probate Division of the Superior Court shall have exclusive original jurisdiction
over all proceedings brought under the authority of this chapter or pursuant to 18 V.S.A. § 9718.
(c) The Probate Division of the Superior Court shall have supervisory authority over guardians.
Any interested person may seek review of a guardian’s proposed or past actions by
filing a motion with the court. (Added 1979, No. 76, § 15; amended 1985, No. 144 (Adj. Sess.), § 157; 2005, No. 55, § 2, eff. Sept. 1, 2005; 2007, No. 186 (Adj. Sess.), § 1; 2009, No. 154 (Adj. Sess.), § 125, eff. Feb. 1, 2011; 2011, No. 56, § 26.)
CitiFinancial, Inc. v. Balch, 2013 VT 86 (Vt. 2013). “” As guardian, Bell is subject to judicial oversight of her actions, 14 V.S.A. § 3062(b), and is accountable by bond to the court to account for the property of the guardian’s estate.”
CitiFinancial, Inc. v. Balch, 195 Vt. 21 (Vt. 2013). “” [6] As guardian, Bell is subject to judicial oversight of her actions, 14 V.S.A. § 3062(b) and is accountable by bond to the court to account for the property of the guardian’s estate.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 14, § 3062(b) — 2 cases
CitiFinancial, Inc. v. Balch, 2013 VT 86 (Vt. 2013). “” As guardian, Bell is subject to judicial oversight of her actions, 14 V.S.A. § 3062(b), and is accountable by bond to the court to account for the property of the guardian’s estate.”
CitiFinancial, Inc. v. Balch, 195 Vt. 21 (Vt. 2013). “” [6] As guardian, Bell is subject to judicial oversight of her actions, 14 V.S.A. § 3062(b) and is accountable by bond to the court to account for the property of the guardian’s estate.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.