Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 4631 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 003 : INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS

(Cite as: 18 V.S.A. § 4631)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2009–2021 · leading case: IMS Health Inc. v. Sorrell, 630 F.3d 263 (2d Cir. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
IMS Health Inc. v. Sorrell, 630 F.3d 263 (2d Cir. 2010). · cites it 20× “, and Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America ("PhRMA") (collectively, "the appellants") challenge a Vermont statute banning the sale, transmission, or use of prescriber-identifiable data ("PI data") for marketing or promoting a prescription drug unless the…”
IMS Health Inc. v. Mills, 616 F.3d 7 (1st Cir. 2010). · cites it 8× “§ 318:47-f; Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 4631 (d). Like its counterparts in New Hampshire and Vermont, the Maine law, section 1711-E(2-A), does so indirectly: in relevant part, it states that "a carrier, pharmacy or prescription drug information intermediary," as defined in the…”
IMS Health Inc. v. Sorrell, 631 F. Supp. 2d 434 (D. Vt. 2009). · cites it 7× “The Act included the following sections, as amended by Act 89, passed in 2008: • Section 17 — prohibiting regulated entities from selling or using prescriberidentifiable data for marketing or promoting prescription drugs unless the prescriber consents, codified at Vt. Stat. Ann.…”
Retail Digit. Network v. Ramona Prieto, 861 F.3d 839 (9th Cir. 2017). · cites it 2× “PRIETO 17 In Sorrell, the Supreme Court addressed a First Amendment challenge to a Vermont statute, Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 4631 (d), that restricted the sale, disclosure, and use of pharmacy records for marketing purposes.”
Furniture Brands Int'l, Inc. v. United States, 2011 CIT 132 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2011). “The statute, which was accompanied by a legislative finding that the marketplace for ideas on medicine safety and effectiveness is frequently one-sided in favor of brand-name drug companies, promoted the dissemination of information on generic drugs for which patents had expired.”
Chamber of Com. for Greater Phila. v. City of Phila., 319 F. Supp. 3d 773 (E.D. Pa. 2018). “2653 (quoting Vt. Stat. Ann. Tit. 18 § 4631(d) ). The law pertained to the process by which pharmaceutical manufacturers marketed a drug to doctors, referred to as "detailing," which entails visiting a doctor's office armed with samples of the drug and explaining the details of…”
IMS Health Inc. v. Sorrell, 631 F. Supp. 2d 429 (D. Vt. 2009). “claim Section 17 of Vermont’s Prescription Confidentiality Law, codified at Vt. Stat. Ann. tit 18, § 4631, is unconstitutional.”
IMS Health, Inc. v. Rowe (1st Cir. 2010). · cites it 4× “§ 318:47 -f; Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 4631 (d). Like its counterparts in New Hampshire and Vermont, the Maine law, section 1711-E(2-A), does so indirectly: in relevant part, it states that "a carrier, pharmacy or prescription drug information intermediary," as defined in the…”
Price v. Barr (D.D.C. 2021). “Act 80, however, circumscribed the use of such data by providing that certain entities, such as pharmacies, “‘shall not .”
Bertolini-Mier v. Upper Valley Neurology Neurosurgery, P.C. (D. Vt. 2019). “’ * The portion of Act 80 codified at 18 V.S.A. § 4631—“section 17” of the Act—was subsequently invalidated upon review in IMS Health Inc.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 4631(d) — 1 case
Chamber of Com. for Greater Phila. v. City of Phila., 319 F. Supp. 3d 773 (E.D. Pa. 2018). “2653 (quoting Vt. Stat. Ann. Tit. 18 § 4631(d) ). The law pertained to the process by which pharmaceutical manufacturers marketed a drug to doctors, referred to as "detailing," which entails visiting a doctor's office armed with samples of the drug and explaining the details of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.