Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 5205 (2026)

Death certificate when no attending physician and in other circumstances; autopsy

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

(Cite as: 18 V.S.A. § 5205)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1969–1992 · leading case: State v. Chambers, 477 A.2d 110 (Vt. 1984).
State v. Chambers, 477 A.2d 110 (Vt. 1984). · cites it 8× “18 V.S.A. § 5205 (f). The defendant refused to allow an autopsy, claiming that his religious beliefs forbade the performance of an autopsy on his child.”
Jobin v. McQuillen, 609 A.2d 990 (Vt. 1992). · cites it 2× “McQuillen performed an autopsy the following day, pursuant to 18 V.S.A. § 5205(f). During the autopsy, she removed the boy’s brain.”
Quesnel v. Raleigh, 258 A.2d 840 (Vt. 1969). “It appears from the record that a blood sample, upon which the defendant’s evidence was given, was lawfully extracted from the deceased in the course of an examination and autopsy performed under authority of 18 V.S.A. § 5205. Such investigation has legal sanction when a person…”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 5205(a): 1 case
State v. Chambers, 477 A.2d 110 (Vt. 1984). “18 V.S.A. § 5205 (f). The defendant refused to allow an autopsy, claiming that his religious beliefs forbade the performance of an autopsy on his child.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 5205(c): 1 case
State v. Chambers, 477 A.2d 110 (Vt. 1984). “18 V.S.A. § 5205 (f). The defendant refused to allow an autopsy, claiming that his religious beliefs forbade the performance of an autopsy on his child.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 5205(f): 2 cases
Jobin v. McQuillen, 609 A.2d 990 (Vt. 1992). “McQuillen performed an autopsy the following day, pursuant to 18 V.S.A. § 5205(f). During the autopsy, she removed the boy’s brain.”
State v. Chambers, 477 A.2d 110 (Vt. 1984). “18 V.S.A. § 5205 (f). The defendant refused to allow an autopsy, claiming that his religious beliefs forbade the performance of an autopsy on his child.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.