Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 18 Chapter 171
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 7103 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 18 V.S.A. § 7103)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2024 · leading case: State v. Koch, 730 A.2d 577 (Vt. 1999).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Koch, 730 A.2d 577 (Vt. 1999). · cites it 5× “Intervenors allege that the district court violated their *110 qualified First Amendment right of access by erroneously requiring closure of the hearing upon defendant’s request and by giving 18 V.S.A. § 7103 an overly broad construction, incompatible with the presumptive public…”
In re Affidavit of Probable Cause (Jacob Oblak, Appellant), 2019 VT 43 (Vt. 2019). “For example, 18 V.S.A. § 7103(a)(3) requires that all applications for hospitalization under the mental health statutes remain undisclosed unless a court determines “that disclosure is necessary for the conduct of the proceedings before it and that failure to make disclosure…”
In re Affidavit of Probable Cause (Jacob Oblak, Appellant), 2019 VT 43 (Vt. 2019). “For example, 18 V.S.A. § 7103(a)(3) requires that all applications for hospitalization under the mental health statutes remain undisclosed unless a court determines “that disclosure is necessary for the conduct of the proceedings before it and that failure to make disclosure…”
Howard Ctr. v. Off. of Prof. Reg. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2020). “§ 1852(a)(7); and 18 V.S.A. § 7103(a). The State argues that Howard Center is not a proper party to assert the patient’s privilege, that the records are available pursuant to 3 V.”
State v. Michael A. Armstrong, 2024 VT 5 (Vt. 2024). “18 V.S.A. § 7103(a). The only information about an incompetent defendant that the 13 State is entitled to receive is a mandatory disclosure ten days prior to discharge of a defendant from DAIL or DMH custody.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 7103(a) — 3 cases
State v. Koch, 730 A.2d 577 (Vt. 1999). “Intervenors allege that the district court violated their *110 qualified First Amendment right of access by erroneously requiring closure of the hearing upon defendant’s request and by giving 18 V.S.A. § 7103 an overly broad construction, incompatible with the presumptive public…”
Howard Ctr. v. Off. of Prof. Reg. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2020). “§ 1852(a)(7); and 18 V.S.A. § 7103(a). The State argues that Howard Center is not a proper party to assert the patient’s privilege, that the records are available pursuant to 3 V.”
State v. Michael A. Armstrong, 2024 VT 5 (Vt. 2024). “18 V.S.A. § 7103(a). The only information about an incompetent defendant that the 13 State is entitled to receive is a mandatory disclosure ten days prior to discharge of a defendant from DAIL or DMH custody.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 7103(a)(3) — 2 cases
In re Affidavit of Probable Cause (Jacob Oblak, Appellant), 2019 VT 43 (Vt. 2019). “For example, 18 V.S.A. § 7103(a)(3) requires that all applications for hospitalization under the mental health statutes remain undisclosed unless a court determines “that disclosure is necessary for the conduct of the proceedings before it and that failure to make disclosure…”
In re Affidavit of Probable Cause (Jacob Oblak, Appellant), 2019 VT 43 (Vt. 2019). “For example, 18 V.S.A. § 7103(a)(3) requires that all applications for hospitalization under the mental health statutes remain undisclosed unless a court determines “that disclosure is necessary for the conduct of the proceedings before it and that failure to make disclosure…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.