Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 7107 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 18 V.S.A. § 7107)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1984–2015 · leading case: Peck v. Counseling Serv. of Addison Cnty., Inc., 499 A.2d 422 (Vt. 1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Peck v. Counseling Serv. of Addison Cnty., Inc., 499 A.2d 422 (Vt. 1985). “18 V.S.A. § 7107(17). It is scientifically recognized that it is impossible to predict future violent behavior.”
State v. Zorn, 2013 VT 65 (Vt. 2013). “1uded that defendant was a “person in need of treatment” as defined by 18 V.S.A. § 7107(17) in that he has been shown to suffer from a mental illness, and as a result of that mental illness, has a diminished capacity to exercise self-control or judgment.”
State v. Zorn, 195 Vt. 381 (Vt. 2013). “Based on the findings, Judge Teachout concluded that defendant was a “person in need of treatment” as defined by 18 V.S.A. § 7107(17) in that he has been shown to suffer from a mental illness, and as a result of that mental illness, has a diminished capacity to exercise…”
In re J.P. (Vt. 2015). · cites it 2× “was a “patient in need of further treatment” under 18 V.S.A. § 7107(16). We note that a “patient in need of further treatment” is defined in relevant part as a “person in need of treatment.”
In Re Wh, 481 A.2d 22 (Vt. 1984). “35 and 37, order that a proposed patient be physically taken into custody for purposes of obtaining a psychiatric evaluation in order to determine whether the proposed patient is a person "in need of treatment" under 18 V.S.A. § 7107(17) prior to considering all other feasible…”
In re J.P. (Vt. 2015). “remained a “patient in need of further treatment” under 18 V.S.A. § 7107(16) (defining “patient in need of further treatment” as either “a person in need of treatment” or “a patient who is receiving adequate treatment, and who, if such treatment is discontinued, presents a…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 7107(16) — 2 cases
In re J.P. (Vt. 2015). “was a “patient in need of further treatment” under 18 V.S.A. § 7107(16). We note that a “patient in need of further treatment” is defined in relevant part as a “person in need of treatment.”
In re J.P. (Vt. 2015). “remained a “patient in need of further treatment” under 18 V.S.A. § 7107(16) (defining “patient in need of further treatment” as either “a person in need of treatment” or “a patient who is receiving adequate treatment, and who, if such treatment is discontinued, presents a…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 7107(16)(A) — 1 case
In re J.P. (Vt. 2015). “was a “patient in need of further treatment” under 18 V.S.A. § 7107(16). We note that a “patient in need of further treatment” is defined in relevant part as a “person in need of treatment.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 7107(17) — 4 cases
Peck v. Counseling Serv. of Addison Cnty., Inc., 499 A.2d 422 (Vt. 1985). “18 V.S.A. § 7107(17). It is scientifically recognized that it is impossible to predict future violent behavior.”
State v. Zorn, 2013 VT 65 (Vt. 2013). “1uded that defendant was a “person in need of treatment” as defined by 18 V.S.A. § 7107(17) in that he has been shown to suffer from a mental illness, and as a result of that mental illness, has a diminished capacity to exercise self-control or judgment.”
State v. Zorn, 195 Vt. 381 (Vt. 2013). “Based on the findings, Judge Teachout concluded that defendant was a “person in need of treatment” as defined by 18 V.S.A. § 7107(17) in that he has been shown to suffer from a mental illness, and as a result of that mental illness, has a diminished capacity to exercise…”
In Re Wh, 481 A.2d 22 (Vt. 1984). “35 and 37, order that a proposed patient be physically taken into custody for purposes of obtaining a psychiatric evaluation in order to determine whether the proposed patient is a person "in need of treatment" under 18 V.S.A. § 7107(17) prior to considering all other feasible…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.