No person may be made subject to involuntary treatment unless he or she is found to
be a person in need of treatment or a patient in need of further treatment. (Added 1977, No. 252 (Adj. Sess.), § 18.)
Peck v. Counseling Serv. of Addison Cnty., Inc., 499 A.2d 422 (Vt. 1985). · cites it 2דA mental health professional's power to control a voluntary patient (18 V.S.A. § 7611 et seq.) is limited to initiating proceedings for involuntary commitment to patients posing a danger to themselves.”
In re T.S.S., 121 A.3d 1184 (Vt. 2015). “” 18 V.S.A. § 7611. In proceedings for involuntary treatment on either basis, the state has “the burden of proving its case by clear and convincing evidence.”
In re T.S.S., 199 Vt. 157 (Vt. 2015). “” 18 V.S.A. § 7611. In proceedings for involuntary treatment on either basis, the State has “the burden of proving its case by clear and convincing evidence.”
In re T.H. (Vt. 2016). “” 18 V.S.A. § 7611. The State has the burden of proving this “by clear and convincing evidence.”
In re T.S.S., 199 Vt. 157 (Vt. 2015). “” 18 V.S.A. § 7611. In proceedings for involuntary treatment on either basis, the state has “the burden of proving its case by clear and convincing evidence.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.