Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 7619 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 18 V.S.A. § 7619)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1980–2017 · leading case: In re G.G., 2017 VT 10 (Vt. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re G.G., 2017 VT 10 (Vt. 2017). “§ 7624(b)(1), the State may file a petition with the family court for the involuntary medication of a patient who refuses to accept medication if the patient is, among other things, subject to an order of hospitalization pursuant to 18 V.S.A. § 7619. In a hearing in which the…”
State v. Mayer, 423 A.2d 492 (Vt. 1980). · cites it 3× “” 18 V.S.A. § 7619 provides that an initial order of hospitalization under the normal civil commitment procedures be for a period of ninety days from the date of the hearing.”
State v. Williams, 467 A.2d 667 (Vt. 1983). “2d 492 (1980) (implicit in the order under § 4822 (a) is a ninety-day limitation pursuant to 18 V.S.A. § 7619, subsequent to which an application may be filed for continued treatment under § 7620).”
State v. B.C., 149 A.3d 143 (Vt. 2016). “The term “indeterminate period” as used in § 4822(a) has been found to mean for a period of up to ninety days, consistent with the express ninety day limit on initial hospitalization orders established in 18 V.”
State v. Spear, 458 A.2d 1098 (Vt. 1983). “Following the hearing the court found the defendant to be “a person in need of treatment” and ordered the defendant committed to the state hospital for an additional period not to exceed 90 days under 18 V.S.A. § 7619. This appeal followed. On appeal the defendant argues, inter…”
State v. B.C. / State v. D.H., 2016 VT 66 (Vt. 2016). “The term “indeterminate period” as used in § 4822(a) has been found to mean for a period of up to ninety days, consistent with the express ninety-day limit on initial hospitalization orders established in 18 V.S.A. § 7619. State v. Mayer, 139 Vt.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.