Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 18 Chapter 181
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 7626 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 18 V.S.A. § 7626)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2007–2007 · leading case: In re L.A., 2007 VT 119 (Vt. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re L.A., 2007 VT 119 (Vt. 2007). · cites it 2× “Given the explicit language of the statute, the State’s contention that it did not have the burden of proving a required element of its own petition by the degree of proof imposed on it by the statute is curious. Nevertheless, the State argues that, as a result of a federal…”
In Re La, 2007 VT 119 (Vt. 2007). · cites it 2× “Nevertheless, the State argues that, as a result of a federal court decision, which struck down a portion of Act 114 on involuntary medication, codified at 18 V.S.A. § 7626(b)-(c) and § 7627(i)-(j), the remainder of the statute, particularly § 7626(a) and § 7625, should not be…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 7626(b) — 2 cases
In re L.A., 2007 VT 119 (Vt. 2007). “Given the explicit language of the statute, the State’s contention that it did not have the burden of proving a required element of its own petition by the degree of proof imposed on it by the statute is curious. Nevertheless, the State argues that, as a result of a federal…”
In Re La, 2007 VT 119 (Vt. 2007). “Nevertheless, the State argues that, as a result of a federal court decision, which struck down a portion of Act 114 on involuntary medication, codified at 18 V.S.A. § 7626(b)-(c) and § 7627(i)-(j), the remainder of the statute, particularly § 7626(a) and § 7625, should not be…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.