Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 9371 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GREEN MOUNTAIN CARE BOARD

(Cite as: 18 V.S.A. § 9371)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 2016–2025 · leading case: In re MVP Health Ins. Co., 2016 VT 111 (Vt. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re MVP Health Ins. Co., 2016 VT 111 (Vt. 2016). “” 18 V.S.A. §9371(11); see also Blue Cross of Ne.”
In Re Nw. Med. Ctr. Fiscal Year 2024 / in Re Rutland Reg'l Med. Ctr. Fiscal Year 2024, 2024 VT 39 (Vt. 2024). “See 18 V.S.A. § 9371. Among its purposes is to “reduc[e] the per-capita rate of growth in expenditures for health services in Vermont across all payers while ensuring that access to care and quality of care are not compromised.”
In Re Cent. Vermont Med. Ctr. Fiscal Year 2025, 2025 VT 53 (Vt. 2025). · cites it 3× “§ 9372), its duty to regulate consistent with the principles of health care reform (18 V.S.A. § 9371; [id.] § 9375(a)), its obligation to establish budgets with the considerations for hospital budget review specifically set forth in statute (18 V.”
state v. onecare (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). · cites it 2× “See 18 V.S.A. §§ 9371–9383; see also Vermont State Auditor v.”
state v. onecare (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). “The GMCB is charged with executing such “duties consistent with the principles expressed” in 18 V.S.A. § 9371. Id. § 9375(a). Those principles include making Vermont’s “health care system .”
Alice Peck Day Mem'l Hosp. v. Smith (D. Vt. 2023). “]” 18 V.S.A. § 9371(1). It is not a part of the State’s Agency of Human Services.”
In Re Rutland Reg'l Med. Ctr. Fiscal Year 2025, 2025 VT 49 (Vt. 2025). “2 RRMC argues that this is contrary to the goals of the Board’s enabling statute, which include that “[t]he State of Vermont must ensure universal access to and coverage for high-quality, medically necessary health services for all Vermonters,” 18 V.S.A. § 9371(1), and “[e]very…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 9371(1) — 3 cases
Alice Peck Day Mem'l Hosp. v. Smith (D. Vt. 2023). “]” 18 V.S.A. § 9371(1). It is not a part of the State’s Agency of Human Services.”
In Re Rutland Reg'l Med. Ctr. Fiscal Year 2025, 2025 VT 49 (Vt. 2025). “2 RRMC argues that this is contrary to the goals of the Board’s enabling statute, which include that “[t]he State of Vermont must ensure universal access to and coverage for high-quality, medically necessary health services for all Vermonters,” 18 V.S.A. § 9371(1), and “[e]very…”
In Re Cent. Vermont Med. Ctr. Fiscal Year 2025, 2025 VT 53 (Vt. 2025). “§ 9372), its duty to regulate consistent with the principles of health care reform (18 V.S.A. § 9371; [id.] § 9375(a)), its obligation to establish budgets with the considerations for hospital budget review specifically set forth in statute (18 V.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 9371(11) — 2 cases
In re MVP Health Ins. Co., 2016 VT 111 (Vt. 2016). “” 18 V.S.A. §9371(11); see also Blue Cross of Ne.”
In Re Cent. Vermont Med. Ctr. Fiscal Year 2025, 2025 VT 53 (Vt. 2025). “§ 9372), its duty to regulate consistent with the principles of health care reform (18 V.S.A. § 9371; [id.] § 9375(a)), its obligation to establish budgets with the considerations for hospital budget review specifically set forth in statute (18 V.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.