Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 19 Chapter 5
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 19, § 501 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 19 V.S.A. § 501)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1989–2026 · leading case: Agency of Transp. v. Timberlake Assocs. (R.L. Vallee, Inc., Appellant), 2020 VT 73 (Vt. 2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Agency of Transp. v. Timberlake Assocs. (R.L. Vallee, Inc., Appellant), 2020 VT 73 (Vt. 2020). · cites it 3× ““Property owner” is defined in 19 V.S.A. § 501(3), which states: “ ‘Interested person’ or ‘person interested in lands’ or ‘property owner’ means a person who has a legal interest of record in the property taken or proposed to be taken.”
In Re Chittenden Solid Waste Dist., 2007 VT 28 (Vt. 2007). · cites it 3× “§ 2299b(2) with 19 V.S.A. § 501(2). Thus, our preexisting case law on damages available in condemnation proceedings is applicable here.”
West Virginia Dep't of Transp., Div. of Highways v. W. Pocahontas Props., L.P., 777 S.E.2d 619 (W. Va. 2015). · cites it 2× “lost profits to the owner of a business or farm operation conducted on the property”); Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 19, § 501 (“Damages resulting from the taking or use of property .”
Pinewood Manor, Inc. v. Vermont Agency of Transp., 668 A.2d 653 (Vt. 1995). · cites it 3× “In a property condemnation proceeding, a land owner can recover for (1) the value of the most reasonable use of the property or right in the property, (2) the value of the business on the property, and (3) the direct and proximate decrease in the value of the remaining property…”
William E. v. Agency of Transp., 2006 VT 68 (Vt. 2006). · cites it 3× “Just compensation for takings that result from highway construction is governed by 19 V.S.A. § 501, which provides, in relevant part: Damages resulting from the taking or use of property under the provisions of this chapter shall be the value for the most reasonable use of the…”
Ondovchik Fam. Ltd. P'ship v. Agency of Transp., 2010 VT 35 (Vt. 2010). “Under 19 V.S.A. § 501(2), landowners who have a portion of their property condemned during eminent domain proceedings can collect additional compensation for any “direct and proximate decrease in the value of the remaining property.”
In re Appeal of Condemnation Award to 89-2 Realty, 566 A.2d 979 (Vt. 1989). · cites it 4× “See 19 V.S.A. § 501(2) (defining damages) (formerly 19 V.”
Mazza v. Agency of Transp., 716 A.2d 817 (Vt. 1998). · cites it 5× “§ 501(2), which provides, in part: Damages resulting from the taking or use of property under the provisions of this chapter shall be the value for the most reasonable use of the property or right in the property, and of the business on the property, and the direct and proximate…”
Raymond v. Chittenden Cnty. Circumferential High., 604 A.2d 1281 (Vt. 1992). · cites it 2× “Plaintiffs argue that the court should have considered the property as if the infrastructure had been developed.”
Rossetti v. Chittenden Cnty. Transp. Auth., 674 A.2d 1284 (Vt. 1996). “As discussed above, the matter was tried in the superior' court pursuant to the condemnation procedure for highways set out in chapter 5 of Title 19.”
Agency of Transp. v. Timberlake Assocs., LLC (R.L. Vallee, Inc. & Crystal Clear Hosp., LLC), 2024 VT 83 (Vt. 2024). · cites it 2× “” 19 V.S.A. § 501(1). ¶ 7. Landowner argues AOT failed to present evidence showing it considered the necessity factors set forth in 19 V.”
In re Chittenden Solid Waste Dist., 182 Vt. 38 (Vt. 2007). · cites it 3× “§ 2299b(2) with 19 V.S.A. § 501(2). Thus, our preexisting case law on damages available in condemnation proceedings is applicable here.”
Show all 19 citing cases →
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 19, § 501(1) — 6 cases
Rossetti v. Chittenden Cnty. Transp. Auth., 674 A.2d 1284 (Vt. 1996). “As discussed above, the matter was tried in the superior' court pursuant to the condemnation procedure for highways set out in chapter 5 of Title 19.”
Agency of Transp. v. Timberlake Assocs., LLC (R.L. Vallee, Inc. & Crystal Clear Hosp., LLC), 2024 VT 83 (Vt. 2024). “” 19 V.S.A. § 501(1). ¶ 7. Landowner argues AOT failed to present evidence showing it considered the necessity factors set forth in 19 V.”
Chittenden Solid Waste Dist. v. Hinesburg Sand & Gravel Co., 730 A.2d 614 (Vt. 1999).
Mongeon Bay Props., LLC v. Town of Colchester, 2026 VT 1 (Vt. 2026).
Champlain Parkway SW Discharge Permit - Decision on Motions (Vt. Super. Ct. 2019).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 19, § 501(1)(D) — 1 case
Friends of Pine Street d/b/a Pine Street Coalition v. City of Burlington, 2020 VT 43 (Vt. 2020).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 19, § 501(2) — 10 cases
In Re Chittenden Solid Waste Dist., 2007 VT 28 (Vt. 2007). “§ 2299b(2) with 19 V.S.A. § 501(2). Thus, our preexisting case law on damages available in condemnation proceedings is applicable here.”
Pinewood Manor, Inc. v. Vermont Agency of Transp., 668 A.2d 653 (Vt. 1995). “In a property condemnation proceeding, a land owner can recover for (1) the value of the most reasonable use of the property or right in the property, (2) the value of the business on the property, and (3) the direct and proximate decrease in the value of the remaining property…”
Ondovchik Fam. Ltd. P'ship v. Agency of Transp., 2010 VT 35 (Vt. 2010). “Under 19 V.S.A. § 501(2), landowners who have a portion of their property condemned during eminent domain proceedings can collect additional compensation for any “direct and proximate decrease in the value of the remaining property.”
William E. v. Agency of Transp., 2006 VT 68 (Vt. 2006). “Just compensation for takings that result from highway construction is governed by 19 V.S.A. § 501, which provides, in relevant part: Damages resulting from the taking or use of property under the provisions of this chapter shall be the value for the most reasonable use of the…”
In re Appeal of Condemnation Award to 89-2 Realty, 566 A.2d 979 (Vt. 1989). “See 19 V.S.A. § 501(2) (defining damages) (formerly 19 V.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 19, § 501(3) — 2 cases
Agency of Transp. v. Timberlake Assocs. (R.L. Vallee, Inc., Appellant), 2020 VT 73 (Vt. 2020). ““Property owner” is defined in 19 V.S.A. § 501(3), which states: “ ‘Interested person’ or ‘person interested in lands’ or ‘property owner’ means a person who has a legal interest of record in the property taken or proposed to be taken.”
Mazza v. Agency of Transp., 716 A.2d 817 (Vt. 1998). “§ 501(2), which provides, in part: Damages resulting from the taking or use of property under the provisions of this chapter shall be the value for the most reasonable use of the property or right in the property, and of the business on the property, and the direct and proximate…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.