Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 20, § 2061 (2026)

Fingerprinting

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 20 V.S.A. § 2061)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2007–2019 · leading case: State v. Stell, 937 A.2d 649 (Vt. 2007).
State v. Stell, 937 A.2d 649 (Vt. 2007). · cites it 7× “In his Rule 34 motion, defendant referenced the fingerprinting statute, 20 V.S.A. § 2061, twice, stating that it “does not provide either a penalty or require a warning of the consequences for failure to obey such an Order as is at issue in this matter” and that fingerprints are…”
State v. Timothy Grant, 2019 VT 91 (Vt. 2019). · cites it 6× “It’s—the statute [20 V.S.A. § 2061] does say that good cause is required.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 20, § 2061(b) — 1 case
State v. Timothy Grant, 2019 VT 91 (Vt. 2019). “It’s—the statute [20 V.S.A. § 2061] does say that good cause is required.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 20, § 2061(d) — 2 cases
State v. Stell, 937 A.2d 649 (Vt. 2007). “In his Rule 34 motion, defendant referenced the fingerprinting statute, 20 V.S.A. § 2061, twice, stating that it “does not provide either a penalty or require a warning of the consequences for failure to obey such an Order as is at issue in this matter” and that fingerprints are…”
State v. Timothy Grant, 2019 VT 91 (Vt. 2019). “It’s—the statute [20 V.S.A. § 2061] does say that good cause is required.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 20, § 2061(e) — 1 case
State v. Stell, 937 A.2d 649 (Vt. 2007). “In his Rule 34 motion, defendant referenced the fingerprinting statute, 20 V.S.A. § 2061, twice, stating that it “does not provide either a penalty or require a warning of the consequences for failure to obey such an Order as is at issue in this matter” and that fingerprints are…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 20, § 2061(k) — 1 case
State v. Timothy Grant, 2019 VT 91 (Vt. 2019). “It’s—the statute [20 V.S.A. § 2061] does say that good cause is required.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.