Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 20, § 2065 (2026)

Ratification of the National Crime Prevention and Privacy Compact

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(Cite as: 20 V.S.A. § 2065)

§ 2065. Ratification of the National Crime Prevention and Privacy Compact

(a) The Vermont General Assembly hereby approves and ratifies the National Crime Prevention and Privacy Compact, 34 U.S.C. §§ 40311- 40316. The Compact shall remain in effect until legislation is enacted renouncing or rescinding the Compact.

(b) The Commissioner of the Department of Public Safety shall execute, administer, and implement the Compact on behalf of the State, and may adopt rules as necessary for the national exchange of criminal history records for noncriminal justice purposes.

(c) Criminal history records as defined in subdivision 2056a(a)(1) of this title shall be made available to lawfully entitled requestors in other states according to the provisions of the National Crime Prevention and Privacy Compact.

(d) Nothing in this section shall alter the duties and responsibilities of the Commissioner of the Department of Public Safety regarding the dissemination of criminal history records within the State of Vermont pursuant to statute. (Added 2009, No. 108 (Adj. Sess.), § 1.)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2019–2019 · leading case: State v. Timothy Grant, 2019 VT 91 (Vt. 2019).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State v. Timothy Grant, 2019 VT 91 (Vt. 2019). · cites it 2× “The Compact makes Vermont part of the III System, which “means the cooperative Federal-State system for the exchange of criminal history records.” 34 U.S.C. § 40316 (Article I(13)(A)).”

— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 20, § 2065(c) — 1 case

State v. Timothy Grant, 2019 VT 91 (Vt. 2019). “The Compact makes Vermont part of the III System, which “means the cooperative Federal-State system for the exchange of criminal history records.” 34 U.S.C. § 40316 (Article I(13)(A)).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.