If an appeal is not taken under the provisions of section 670 of this chapter within
the time provided, either party may transfer the cause to the Supreme Court. The jurisdiction
of the Court shall be limited to a review of questions of law certified to it by the
Commissioner. On such an appeal or on an appeal taken as provided in sections 670
and 671 of this chapter and coming to the Supreme Court on appeal from Superior Court,
the Supreme Court may render final judgment and award execution, or may remand the
cause to the Superior Court or to the Commissioner for further findings or for a new
order by the Commissioner in accordance with the mandate of the Court. The Court shall,
by general rules, prescribe the procedure to be followed in the case of such appeals. (Amended 1973, No. 193 (Adj. Sess.), § 3, eff. April 9, 1974; 2023, No. 85 (Adj. Sess.), § 141, eff. July 1, 2024.)
Est. of George v. Vermont League of Cities & Towns, 2010 VT 1 (Vt. 2010). · cites it 4דWhether an evidentiary ruling, or a ruling on the adequacy of the evidence to reach a fact-finder, is "fact-based" is beside the point.”
Clodgo v. Rentavision, Inc., 701 A.2d 1044 (Vt. 1997). · cites it 2דRentavision contested the award, arguing that claimant was engaged in noncompensable horseplay at the time of the injury.”
Houle v. Ethan Allen, Inc., 2011 VT 62 (Vt. 2011). · cites it 2ד21 V.S.A. § 672. The question certified here was “[d]id the Commissioner err in concluding that claimant’s right shoulder condition was compensable?” In other words, did the Commissioner correctly conclude that claimant’s injury was incurred “by accident arising out of and in…”
YUSTIN v. Dep't of Pub. Saf., 2011 VT 20 (Vt. 2011). · cites it 2דClaimant appealed directly to this Court pursuant to 21 V.S.A. § 672, and the Commissioner certified the following question for review: "Was it proper for [DPS] to offset the sick leave wages it paid to Claimant during his period of temporary total disability from the workers'…”
Cyr v. Mcdermott's, Inc., 2010 VT 19 (Vt. 2010). “See 21 V.S.A. § 672 (limiting the jurisdiction of this Court in direct appeals from Commissioner's workers' compensation decisions to consideration of questions certified to it by the Commissioner).”
Morrisseau v. Legac, 181 A.2d 53 (Vt. 1962). · cites it 2ד, one of the defendants, and the claimant, Pauline Ann Morrisseau, from certain findings, conclusions, and orders- of the Commissioner of Industrial Relations, pursuant to the provisions of 21 V.S.A. §672. Certain questions were certified to this Court by the Commissioner for…”
Montgomery v. Brinver Corp., 457 A.2d 644 (Vt. 1983). “21 V.S.A. § 672. The Commissioner of Labor and Industry certified four questions for review, but because our ruling on the first question is dispositive of this appeal, it is not necessary to reach the others.”
Sanz v. Douglas Collins Constr., 2006 VT 102 (Vt. 2006). “” The Commissioner denied the motion, rejecting claimant’s argument that § 652(b) as amended in 2000 was a procedural change, and held that it could not be retroactively applied to cases in which the injuries predate its enactment. ¶ 5. Our review in a direct appeal from a…”
Peabody v. Home Ins., 751 A.2d 783 (Vt. 2000). · cites it 2דThe authority for appealing to this Court from a workers’ compensation decision of the Commissioner is in 21 VS.A. § 672, which provides in part: “The jurisdiction of such court shall be limited to a review of questions of law certified to it by the commissioner.”
Jackson v. True Temper Corp., 590 A.2d 891 (Vt. 1991). · cites it 2ד21 V.S.A. § 672. Affirmed as to the fee award for attorney's time on judicial appeals.”
Butler v. Huttig Bldg. Prods., 2003 VT 48 (Vt. 2003). “The Commissioner certified three questions 1 for our determination in accordance with 21 V.S.A. § 672, which we have reworked into a single question for clarity: Which, if any, compensation benefits should claimant forfeit because of his fraud? As we explain, the answer to that…”
Demag v. Am. Ins. Companies, 508 A.2d 697 (Vt. 1986). “Superior court jurisdiction is “limited to a review of questions of fact or questions of fact and law certified to it by the commissioner .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.