Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 23 Chapter 13
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 23, § 1004 (2026)

Interstate highway rules

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GENERAL PROVISIONS

(Cite as: 23 V.S.A. § 1004)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1964–1996 · leading case: State v. Stevens, 552 A.2d 410 (Vt. 1988).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Stevens, 552 A.2d 410 (Vt. 1988). · cites it 2× “See 23 V.S.A. § 1004(a). Thus, a three point penalty applies under § 2502(a)(1)(H) irrespective of the extent to which the operator exceeds the speed limit.”
State v. Vanhouten, 679 A.2d 900 (Vt. 1996). “2d at 307-08 (in drug possession case, where car passed through short stretch of state land between Canadian border and immigration station, State could proceed on theory of possession in Vermont); 23 VS.A. § 1004(a), (b) (regulations relating to traffic and public safety are…”
State v. Stone, 201 A.2d 703 (Vt. 1964). “The respondent was tried by jury in the Addison Municipal Court on June 7, 1963, on an information charging him with leaving the scene of an accident contraiy to the provisions of 23 V.S.A. §1004(a). Trial resulted in a conviction of guilty and respondent has taken his appeal to…”
State v. Robinson, 204 A.2d 163 (Vt. 1964). “On March 19, 1964 the state’s attorney of Caledonia County filed an information in the Caledonia County Court charging the respondent with leaving the scene of a motor vehicle accident contrary to the provisions of 23 V.S.A. §1004(a). The respondent countered with a pleading…”
State v. Amarantes, 465 A.2d 1383 (Vt. 1983). “23 V.S.A. § 1004. He argues that (1) the court erred by denying his motion to dismiss, and (2) the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that his vehicle was within the “zone of influence” of the radar unit.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 23, § 1004(a): 4 cases
State v. Stevens, 552 A.2d 410 (Vt. 1988). “See 23 V.S.A. § 1004(a). Thus, a three point penalty applies under § 2502(a)(1)(H) irrespective of the extent to which the operator exceeds the speed limit.”
State v. Vanhouten, 679 A.2d 900 (Vt. 1996). “2d at 307-08 (in drug possession case, where car passed through short stretch of state land between Canadian border and immigration station, State could proceed on theory of possession in Vermont); 23 VS.A. § 1004(a), (b) (regulations relating to traffic and public safety are…”
State v. Stone, 201 A.2d 703 (Vt. 1964). “The respondent was tried by jury in the Addison Municipal Court on June 7, 1963, on an information charging him with leaving the scene of an accident contraiy to the provisions of 23 V.S.A. §1004(a). Trial resulted in a conviction of guilty and respondent has taken his appeal to…”
State v. Robinson, 204 A.2d 163 (Vt. 1964). “On March 19, 1964 the state’s attorney of Caledonia County filed an information in the Caledonia County Court charging the respondent with leaving the scene of a motor vehicle accident contrary to the provisions of 23 V.S.A. §1004(a). The respondent countered with a pleading…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.