Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 23, § 1007 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GENERAL PROVISIONS

(Cite as: 23 V.S.A. § 1007)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1981–2019 · leading case: State v. Yorkey, 657 A.2d 1079 (Vt. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Yorkey, 657 A.2d 1079 (Vt. 1995). · cites it 5× “The Danville ordinance was adopted in 1990, claiming authority under 23 V.S.A. §§ 1007 and 1008,24 V.S.A. §§ 1971 and 2291(1), (4) and (5).”
State v. Page, 457 A.2d 653 (Vt. 1983). · cites it 5× “Defendant appeals, claiming the State failed to prove due enactment of the ordinance pursuant to *523 23 V.S.A. § 1007. More specifically, he claims that the State did not prove that the speed limit was adopted as a result and on the basis of the requisite engineering and…”
State v. Atwood, 438 A.2d 387 (Vt. 1981). · cites it 4× “§ 2203, alleged violations of 123 V.S.A. § 1007 and Montpelier city ordinance.”
State v. Morse, 572 A.2d 1342 (Vt. 1990). “Defendant appeals a speeding conviction, claiming that the ordinance imposing the relevant speed limit was not based on “an engineering and traffic investigation,” as required by 23 V.S.A. § 1007. In addition to offering his own testimony that he was unable to locate any traffic…”
Bandler v. Town of Woodstock (D. Vt. 2019). · cites it 5× “eks to assert four claims arising out of a traffic citation he was issued on June 20, 2015 in the Village: (1) the Village ordinance authorizing the citation is void for vagueness; (2) the relevant speed limit sign in the Village was illegal and violated Plaintiff's due process…”
State v. Gagne, 535 A.2d 790 (Vt. 1987). “Further, 23 V.S.A. § 1007 sets out minimum and maximum speed limits in miles per hour, thus providing that such is the unit of measurement for the speed of motor vehicles in Vermont.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 23, § 1007(a) — 2 cases
State v. Yorkey, 657 A.2d 1079 (Vt. 1995). “The Danville ordinance was adopted in 1990, claiming authority under 23 V.S.A. §§ 1007 and 1008,24 V.S.A. §§ 1971 and 2291(1), (4) and (5).”
State v. Page, 457 A.2d 653 (Vt. 1983). “Defendant appeals, claiming the State failed to prove due enactment of the ordinance pursuant to *523 23 V.S.A. § 1007. More specifically, he claims that the State did not prove that the speed limit was adopted as a result and on the basis of the requisite engineering and…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 23, § 1007(a)(1) — 1 case
Bandler v. Town of Woodstock (D. Vt. 2019). “eks to assert four claims arising out of a traffic citation he was issued on June 20, 2015 in the Village: (1) the Village ordinance authorizing the citation is void for vagueness; (2) the relevant speed limit sign in the Village was illegal and violated Plaintiff's due process…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.