Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 23, § 1008 (2026)

Ordinances in municipalities

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GENERAL PROVISIONS

(Cite as: 23 V.S.A. § 1008)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1962–2009 · leading case: Hebert v. Stanley, 201 A.2d 698 (Vt. 1964).
Hebert v. Stanley, 201 A.2d 698 (Vt. 1964). · cites it 2× “23 V.S.A. §1008, as amended by Act No. 104 passed at the 1961 session of the Legislature, authorizes the selectmen of a town, the trustees of an incorporated village and the aldermen or city council to make regulations with respect to stop signs at intersections.”
State v. Pelletier, 185 A.2d 456 (Vt. 1962). “However, since the state’s attorney was basing his right to proceed upon 23 V.S.A. §1008 (under which the legislature has recognized *273 that the state has, at least, a co-existing interest with the municipality in the control of motor vehicles and matters relating thereto)…”
State v. Kearney, 2009 VT 56, 979 A.2d 465. · cites it 2× “23 V.S.A. § 1008. Whether a road in a town is a state highway, and whether the town ordinance is a valid enactment with respect to the roads in question, are elements of the traffic offense that the State has the burden of proving.”
Meacham v. Conway, 435 A.2d 961 (Vt. 1981). · cites it 2× “We can agree that ordinances adopted under 23 V.S.A. § 1008, establishing local authority to make special regulations for vehicles other than as to speed, would not be “provisions of this title.”
Bitensky v. Hicks, 184 A.2d 216 (Vt. 1962). “Immediately 23 V.S.A §1008 is for consideration. The above section is headed “Traffic regulations in municipalities —Generally.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 23, § 1008(a): 1 case
State v. Kearney, 2009 VT 56, 979 A.2d 465. “23 V.S.A. § 1008. Whether a road in a town is a state highway, and whether the town ordinance is a valid enactment with respect to the roads in question, are elements of the traffic offense that the State has the burden of proving.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.