Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 23, § 634 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 002 : EXAMINATIONS

(Cite as: 23 V.S.A. § 634)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2026–2026 · leading case: State v. Clearview Ai (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Clearview Ai (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026). “A practice may be unfair because of the degree to which 3To the extent it is relevant to the motion to dismiss, the court rejects as entirely unpersuasive Clearview’s suggestion that the State’s action is preempted by 23 V.S.A. § 634(c). See Clearview’s Mem. at 67—68.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 23, § 634(c) — 1 case
State v. Clearview Ai (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026). “A practice may be unfair because of the degree to which 3To the extent it is relevant to the motion to dismiss, the court rejects as entirely unpersuasive Clearview’s suggestion that the State’s action is preempted by 23 V.S.A. § 634(c). See Clearview’s Mem. at 67—68.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.