Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 1092 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 010 : PENSION SYSTEM; INSURANCE

(Cite as: 24 V.S.A. § 1092)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1968–2000 · leading case: Medlar v. Aetna Ins. Co., 248 A.2d 740 (Vt. 1968).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Medlar v. Aetna Ins. Co., 248 A.2d 740 (Vt. 1968). · cites it 8× “” Appellee Goodrich contends that the exclusion provision IH(c) is void as against public policy by virtue of 24 V.S.A. §1092, and thus, if void, protection would be afforded Medlar on the claim being made against him by Goodrich.”
McMurphy v. State, 757 A.2d 1043 (Vt. 2000). “See 24 V.S.A. § 1092. When a municipal corporation purchases a liability insurance policy under § 1092, “it waives its sovereign *15 immunity from liability to the extent of the coverage of the policy and consents to be sued.”
Town of Milton v. Brault, 320 A.2d 630 (Vt. 1974). · cites it 2× “The wording of the amended entry order does not manifest an intent, nor can such an intent be reasonably inferred, to abrogate the applicable law governing the liability of municipalities for good faith enforcement of zoning ordinances.”
Lewis v. Vermont, 289 F. Supp. 246 (D. Vt. 1968). “§§ 1401, 1403 and 24 V.S.A. § 1092 which were in full force and effect at the time of the alleged accident and that the said defendants thereby waived their sovereign immunity to the extent of the coverage.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.