(a) A sheriff so commissioned and sworn shall serve and execute lawful writs, warrants,
and processes directed to the sheriff, according to the precept thereof, and do all
other things pertaining to the office of sheriff.
(b) A sheriff shall maintain a record of the sheriff’s work schedule, including work days,
leave taken, and any remote work performed outside the sheriff’s district for a period
of more than three days.
(c) If an individual who has a relief from abuse order pursuant to 15 V.S.A. § 1103 requires assistance in the retrieval of personal belongings from the individual’s
residence and that individual requests assistance from a sheriff’s department providing
law enforcement services in the county in which that individual resides, the sheriff’s
department shall provide the assistance.
(d) A sheriff shall provide law enforcement and security services for each county and
State courthouse within the sheriff’s county of jurisdiction in accordance with section 291a of this title. (Amended 2023, No. 30, § 6, eff. May 31, 2023; 2023, No. 30, § 6c, eff. January 1, 2024.)
In Re Appeal of Application for Search Warrant, 2012 VT 102 (Vt. 2012). · cites it 2ד[8] More relevant is 24 V.S.A. § 293, which addresses the powers and responsibilities of a sheriff, and by cross-reference all other law enforcement officers in Vermont.”
Dowlings, Inc. v. Mayo, 409 A.2d 588 (Vt. 1979). “” 24 V.S.A. § 293; 12 Y.S.A. § 693. Defendant received a writ of execution and a letter from the plaintiff.”
In Re Huard, 212 A.2d 640 (Vt. 1965). “24 V.S.A. §293 provides that “A sheriff so commissioned and sworn shall serve and execute lawful writs, warrants and processes directed to him.”
Huminski v. Rutland Cnty. Sheriff's Dept., 211 F. Supp. 2d 520 (D. Vt. 2002). “; 24 V.S.A. § 293. Second, it is telling that on the same morning Huminski received the first notice barring him from the District Court building and grounds, Corsones directed Deputy Sheriff Schutt to serve Huminski with an additional notice barring him from entering her own…”
Huminski v. Rutland Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, 211 F. Supp. 2d 520 (D. Vt. 2002). “; 24 V.S.A. § 293. Second, it is telling that on the same morning Huminski received the first notice barring him from the District Court building and grounds, Corsones directed Deputy Sheriff Sehutt to serve Huminski with an additional notice barring him from entering her own…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.