Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 311 (2026)

Training requirements

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 005 : SHERIFFS

(Cite as: 24 V.S.A. § 311)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1983–1991 · leading case: State v. Beattie, 596 A.2d 919 (Vt. 1991).
State v. Beattie, 596 A.2d 919 (Vt. 1991). “Defendant’s contention is that even though Deputy Sheriff Smith had completed the training requirements established for deputy sheriffs in 24 V.S.A. § 311, because he had not completed the training requirements established for full-time law enforcement officers he lacked…”
State v. Mitchell, 458 A.2d 1089 (Vt. 1983). “However, defendant argues that the officer was not properly appointed as a deputy sheriff because he had not satisfied the training requirements of 24 V.S.A. § 311, and, therefore, he was not a law enforcement officer.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.