Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 24 Chapter 117
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4301 (2026)

Short title

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GENERAL PROVISIONS; DEFINITIONS

(Cite as: 24 V.S.A. § 4301)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2002–2026 · leading case: In re Appeals of Shantee Point, Inc., 811 A.2d 1243 (Vt. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re Appeals of Shantee Point, Inc., 811 A.2d 1243 (Vt. 2002). “” SPE argues that the Town’s authority to enact subdivision regulations must be based on the Vermont Planning and Development Act, 24 V.S.A § 4301 et seq., see In re Lowe, 164 Vt.”
In re Appeal of Tekram Partners, 2005 VT 92, 883 A.2d 1160. “In 2004, the Vermont Planning and Development Act, 24 V.S.A. § 4301 et seq., was substantially reorganized, whereby many sections were added, *629 repealed, or renumbered.”
Diverging Diamond Interchange SW Permit, No. 50-6-16 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Nov. 22, 2017). “While this retroactivity rule applies to town plans, which, like zoning regulations, are creatures of Vermont’s Planning and Development Act, 24 V.S.A. § 4301 et seq., it becomes relevant to Act 250 proceedings insofar as Criterion 10 requires conformity with “any duly adopted…”
Whitaker v. Accd, No. 25-cv-3918 (Vt. Super. Ct. Jan. 20, 2026). “117 (24 V.S.A. §§ 4301–4498). Because neither party raised this issue in its briefing, and dismissal is clearly warranted for the reasons raised by Defendants, the court decides the motion on Rule 12(b)(6) grounds for the sake of expedience, and takes no position in this…”
SP Land Co., LLC Golf Course PUD, No. 74-5-10 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Jan. 27, 2011). “” Although “a decision” is not defined by the Vermont Planning and Development Act, 24 V.S.A. §§ 4301–4498, we find no authority for limiting the interpretation of an appealable decision to only those that render the final approval for a development project; we conclude that the…”
Appeal of Highlands Dev. Co, LLC & JAM Golf, LLC, No. 194-10-03 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Aug. 11, 2005). “18, relating to Master plan review and Approval, were adopted lawfully on May 12, 2003;  Whether the Master Plan Ordinance exceeds the zoning and planning authority of the City pursuant to the Vermont Planning and Development Act (the Act), 24 V.S.A. §§ 4301–4496 (2003) (as…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.