§ 4443. Adoption, amendment, or repeal of capital budget and program
(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, a capital budget and program
may be adopted, amended, or repealed by the legislative body of a municipality following
one or more public hearings, upon public notice, if a utility and facilities plan
as described in subdivision 4382(a)(4) of this title has been adopted by the legislative body in accordance with sections 4384 and 4385 of this title. A copy of the proposed capital budget and program shall be filed at least 15 days
prior to the final public hearing with the clerk of the municipality and the secretary
of the planning commission. The planning commission may submit a report on the proposal
to the legislative body prior to the public hearing.
(b) The capital budget and program, or its amendment or repeal, shall be adopted or rejected
by an act of the legislative body of a municipality promptly after the final public
hearing held under subsection (a) of this section. (Added 2003, No. 115 (Adj. Sess.), § 100.)
In Re Handy, 764 A.2d 1226 (Vt. 2000). · cites it 7דIf we look at the zoning statutes overall, we find general and inclusive policy statements that do not help provide limits for administration of § 4443(d).”
Bianchi v. Lorenz, 701 A.2d 1037 (Vt. 1997). · cites it 4דSee 24 V.S.A. § 4443(a)(2) (municipalities may require that certificates of occupancy be issued prior to use of land or structure where such land or structure has been created, erected, changed, converted, altered or enlarged) (emphasis added); cf.”
In Re Champlain Oil Co., 2004 VT 44 (Vt. 2004). · cites it 3דSee 24 V.S.A. § 4443(d) (once locality issues notice of first public hearing on amendments to local regulations, projects shall be reviewed under the proposed amendments).”
In Re John A. Russell Corp., 2003 VT 93 (Vt. 2003). “2d 1226, 1239 (2000) (“jurisdictions keying vested rights to the date of applcation generaly have an exception for cases where a zoning change is pending on that date”); see also 24 V.S.A. § 4443(d) (zoning permit applcations filed within 150 days of pubic notice of first…”
Preseault v. Wheel, 315 A.2d 244 (Vt. 1974). · cites it 4דThis denial was based specifically on 24 V.S.A. § 4443(c), which provides: If a public notice is issued under this chapter with respect to an amendment of a by-law, the administrative officer shall not issue any permit under section (a) (1) of this section, if such permit is…”
In Re Appeal of Hignite, 2003 VT 111 (Vt. 2003). “Hignite claims that the administrator failed to inform her that the permit had issued, and failed to post the permit in a public place for fifteen days following issuance, as required by 24 V.S.A. § 4443(b)(2). * ¶ 3. On October 13, the administrator received Hignite’s letter…”
Wesco, Inc. v. City of Montpelier, 739 A.2d 1241 (Vt. 1999). “See 24 V.S.A. § 4443(a)(1) (no land development may be initiated within an area affected by zoning regulations without permit issued by the zoning administrator); see also 24 V.”
In re Appeal of Smith, 898 A.2d 1251 (Vt. 2006). “” The zoning administrator publicly posted the permit as provided by 24 V.S.A. § 4443(b), and it was not appealed within the fifteen-day appeal period, as required by 24 V.”
Fenwick v. City of Burlington, 708 A.2d 561 (Vt. 1997). “2) December 12, 1988: Allegedly on the advice of the planning commission, plaintiff appealed to the Burlington Board of Aldermen, pursuant to 24 V.S.A. § 4443(c), for relief from the pending ordinance amendment increasing the minimum lot size for a PRD.”
In Re Cumberland Farms, Inc., 557 A.2d 486 (Vt. 1989). “On the contrary, 24 V.S.A. § 4443(a)(1) prohibits the zoning administrator from issuing a permit “except in conformance with .”
In Re Scheiber, 724 A.2d 475 (Vt. 1998). “Pursuant to 24 V.S.A. § 4443(a)(1), “[n]o land development may be commenced [within any municipality having adopted zoning regulations] within the area affected by such zoning regulations without a permit therefor issued by the administrative officer.”
Phillips Constr. Servs., Inc. v. Town of Ferrisburg, 580 A.2d 50 (Vt. 1990). “The trial court found that notice of the decision was duly posted in accordance with the statute, 24 V.S.A. § 4443(b)(2). Plaintiff appealed the decision to the Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA) on July 1,1987.”
Wesco, Inc. v. City of Montpelier, 739 A.2d 1241 (Vt. 1999). “See 24 V.S.A. § 4443(a)(1) (no land development may be initiated within an area affected by zoning regulations without permit issued by the zoning administrator); see also 24 V.”
In Re Cumberland Farms, Inc., 557 A.2d 486 (Vt. 1989). “On the contrary, 24 V.S.A. § 4443(a)(1) prohibits the zoning administrator from issuing a permit “except in conformance with .”
In Re Scheiber, 724 A.2d 475 (Vt. 1998). “Pursuant to 24 V.S.A. § 4443(a)(1), “[n]o land development may be commenced [within any municipality having adopted zoning regulations] within the area affected by such zoning regulations without a permit therefor issued by the administrative officer.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4443(a)(2) — 1 case
Bianchi v. Lorenz, 701 A.2d 1037 (Vt. 1997). “See 24 V.S.A. § 4443(a)(2) (municipalities may require that certificates of occupancy be issued prior to use of land or structure where such land or structure has been created, erected, changed, converted, altered or enlarged) (emphasis added); cf.”
In re Appeal of Smith, 898 A.2d 1251 (Vt. 2006). “” The zoning administrator publicly posted the permit as provided by 24 V.S.A. § 4443(b), and it was not appealed within the fifteen-day appeal period, as required by 24 V.”
In Re Appeal of Hignite, 2003 VT 111 (Vt. 2003). “Hignite claims that the administrator failed to inform her that the permit had issued, and failed to post the permit in a public place for fifteen days following issuance, as required by 24 V.S.A. § 4443(b)(2). * ¶ 3. On October 13, the administrator received Hignite’s letter…”
Phillips Constr. Servs., Inc. v. Town of Ferrisburg, 580 A.2d 50 (Vt. 1990). “The trial court found that notice of the decision was duly posted in accordance with the statute, 24 V.S.A. § 4443(b)(2). Plaintiff appealed the decision to the Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA) on July 1,1987.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4443(b)(2003) — 1 case
In Re Handy, 764 A.2d 1226 (Vt. 2000). “If we look at the zoning statutes overall, we find general and inclusive policy statements that do not help provide limits for administration of § 4443(d).”
Preseault v. Wheel, 315 A.2d 244 (Vt. 1974). “This denial was based specifically on 24 V.S.A. § 4443(c), which provides: If a public notice is issued under this chapter with respect to an amendment of a by-law, the administrative officer shall not issue any permit under section (a) (1) of this section, if such permit is…”
Fenwick v. City of Burlington, 708 A.2d 561 (Vt. 1997). “2) December 12, 1988: Allegedly on the advice of the planning commission, plaintiff appealed to the Burlington Board of Aldermen, pursuant to 24 V.S.A. § 4443(c), for relief from the pending ordinance amendment increasing the minimum lot size for a PRD.”
In Re Handy, 764 A.2d 1226 (Vt. 2000). “If we look at the zoning statutes overall, we find general and inclusive policy statements that do not help provide limits for administration of § 4443(d).”
In Re Champlain Oil Co., 2004 VT 44 (Vt. 2004). “See 24 V.S.A. § 4443(d) (once locality issues notice of first public hearing on amendments to local regulations, projects shall be reviewed under the proposed amendments).”
In Re John A. Russell Corp., 2003 VT 93 (Vt. 2003). “2d 1226, 1239 (2000) (“jurisdictions keying vested rights to the date of applcation generaly have an exception for cases where a zoning change is pending on that date”); see also 24 V.S.A. § 4443(d) (zoning permit applcations filed within 150 days of pubic notice of first…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.