Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4475 (2026)

Repealed. 2003, No. 115 (Adj. Sess.), § 119(c).

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 011 : APPEALS

(Cite as: 24 V.S.A. § 4475)

§ 4475. Repealed. 2003, No. 115 (Adj. Sess.), § 119(c).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1981–1999 · leading case: In Re Appeal of Miller, 742 A.2d 1219 (Vt. 1999).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In Re Appeal of Miller, 742 A.2d 1219 (Vt. 1999). · cites it 2× “The statutes separately provide for appeals *76 from the planning commission, see 24 V.S.A. § 4475, and we have treated site plan review and conditional use review as separate — albeit related — proceedings.”

Smith v. Winhall Plan. Comm'n, 436 A.2d 760 (Vt. 1981). “24 V.S.A. § 4475. Those are governed by 24 V.”

George v. Timberlake Assocs., 739 A.2d 1207 (Vt. 1999). “” 24 VS.A. § 4475. We are therefore disinclined to be cavalier with the appeal rights of parties who have an interest in site plan approvals.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.