Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 26 Chapter 28
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 26, § 1582 (2026)

Regulatory authority; unprofessional conduct

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GENERAL PROVISIONS

(Cite as: 26 V.S.A. § 1582)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1991–2012 · leading case: Douglas v. Windham Superior Court, 597 A.2d 774 (Vt. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Douglas v. Windham Superior Court, 597 A.2d 774 (Vt. 1991). · cites it 4× “See 26 V.S.A. § 1582(b)(4). We have no idea what the views of the Board or its executive officer are with respect to the disclosure of the records in controversy.”
In Re Smith, 730 A.2d 605 (Vt. 1999). “Although agencies must generally follow the rules of evidence, Vermont’s APA relaxes the rules of admissibility for agency proceedings, including nursing board disciplinary actions.”
Shaddy v. Brattleboro Retreat, 2012 VT 67 (Vt. 2012). · cites it 2× “” The most specific of these charges read that, in violation of 26 V.S.A. § 1582(a)(7), plaintiff “engage[d] in conduct of a character likely to deceive, defraud or harm the public which include[d], but [was] not limited to, diverting supplies, equipment, or drugs for personal…”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 26, § 1582(a)(7): 1 case
Shaddy v. Brattleboro Retreat, 2012 VT 67 (Vt. 2012). “” The most specific of these charges read that, in violation of 26 V.S.A. § 1582(a)(7), plaintiff “engage[d] in conduct of a character likely to deceive, defraud or harm the public which include[d], but [was] not limited to, diverting supplies, equipment, or drugs for personal…”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 26, § 1582(b): 1 case
In Re Smith, 730 A.2d 605 (Vt. 1999). “Although agencies must generally follow the rules of evidence, Vermont’s APA relaxes the rules of admissibility for agency proceedings, including nursing board disciplinary actions.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 26, § 1582(b)(4): 1 case
Douglas v. Windham Superior Court, 597 A.2d 774 (Vt. 1991). “See 26 V.S.A. § 1582(b)(4). We have no idea what the views of the Board or its executive officer are with respect to the disclosure of the records in controversy.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 26, § 1582(b)(8): 1 case
Douglas v. Windham Superior Court, 597 A.2d 774 (Vt. 1991). “See 26 V.S.A. § 1582(b)(4). We have no idea what the views of the Board or its executive officer are with respect to the disclosure of the records in controversy.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.